I'm aware of how the budgeting process works. You don't need to have an intricate knowledge of that process to understand that allocating $39B toward USAID in an appropriations bill is a waste of taxpayer dollars.
What I sought to do in my post is demonstrate that while $39B is an inconsequential amount of money to the federal government as a percentage of outlays, it can translate into a consequential amount of money for a working class American. If the US is going to be in the business of giving $39B in hand-outs, why are we giving it to people overseas when we can't fund our own government and/or take care of our own people? That is the principle of the question and "well, it's only 0.58% of our budget" not only doesn't answer the mail, it's completely tone deaf.
It really has negligible impact to our society. Like, maybe 0.58% of people at most are impacted by it. As for the budget numbers... I guess a growing deficit from 2024 is reason to slash USAID, no?