I don't know how it is these days, but back in the stone age a guy might jump right back into the saddle, even after a total hull loss. (Can't remember, is that a class 3 ?) Get yourself checked out by the corpman, write a basic account and if the skipper thinks you haven't done anything too bone headed, you are right back on the sked. The investigation will may take weeks, can't keep a good man down that long. The C.O. owns the planes. Until an investigation reveals a major violation of SOP or fundamental problems with airmanship, followed by a negative FNAEB board, he can fly the guy as much or as little as he wants.
These days a Class A mishap requires completion of the investigation and FNAEB recommendation prior to the aircrew flying again. It can take weeks or even months.Brett
Good buddy left his Prowler in a smoking hole in the Olympics and the whole crew was flying two days later. Ya times were different.
These days a Class A mishap requires completion of the investigation and FNAEB recommendation prior to the aircrew flying again. It can take weeks or even months.
Brett
That's not always the case. If there are indications that the aircrew is obviously not at fault the CO can fly the aircrew prior to the completion of all the investigations...saw this in one of my previous squadrons a couple of years ago when the hook failed after the trap and the aircrew shelled out as the jet was too slow to fly away. The CO flew the crew 2 days later.
Warning: Speculation about the cause of accidents will get you banned
That's not always the case.
Maybe not by instruction, but in practice that's pretty much how it's done.
Brett
I wonder what percentage of actively flying aviators have had a Class A mishap in their career. Kinda be an interesting statistic to know your chances of someday being "that guy."
Warning: Speculation about the cause of accidents will get you banned
I find this to be a very strange policy. Hanger flying mishaps is a very important aspect in preparing yourself for a potential emergency. I understand the need to keep privileged information private, but I dare you to show me a squadron whose pilots don't discuss potential reasons for a mishap. Its a good exersise.
Jim