Agree 100% on all counts, but I think I'd throw NATOPS in with initial or at least warfare-centric job duties. Perhaps that's just proof that the NAE really only cares about in-aircraft performance for the first X tours.Yeah, but NATOPS is still the gold standard of what the private sector calls “continuous improvement.” Try to throw a lightweight process framework like that in places that could squarely use it, and people look at you like you have a dick growing out of your forehead.
There’s days I feel like if I could found a software company with a bunch of former mil aviators and maybe some civilians that really got it, that type of company would slay it.