Concur with Squeeze. There are lots of reasons to want/have nuke power vice petroleum based. We probably shouldn't be automatically against Iran's desire to have nuke power provided that their fuel cycle operations are "managed" so they don't use it for weapons. Nuke power, if done right, is cheaper and cleaner than the alternatives.IRfly said:Big credibility issue. Iran has huge oil reserves and the largest (or 2nd largest after Russia, I can't remember) natural gas reserves in the world. Nuclear power is several times more expensive as an "energy source." And again, if it's so innocent, why didn't they just keep us all updated all along?
Brett
on environmental issues, but Nuke power is arguably a global warming friendly source of power. Chose your poison, I guess. I'm also not one that believes that the oil supply will run out any time soon either. I could write a dissertation on that but, I'll spare you the details. There IS an interest in decreasing foreign dependance, as well as providing new sources for some of the electricity intensive alternatives to gas powered cars (hydrogen/electric/etc). Discovery of fusion power notwithstanding, nuke power seems to fit that bill pretty well.