exNavyOffRec
Well-Known Member
nearly double the historical averageLast board: 34 out of 191 = 17.8%
Current board: 22 out of 133 = 16.5%
not too bad.
nearly double the historical averageLast board: 34 out of 191 = 17.8%
Current board: 22 out of 133 = 16.5%
not too bad.
Any chance you have some numbers for 1810?
Got it. Thank you.Not released yet.
PROREC-Y for 1820!
Civilian
BS Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Minor: Mathematics (3.74) (Tier 1 University)
MS Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology (4.0) Thesis on a bioinformatics analysis of lepidopteran immunity when challenged with viral and bacterial pathogens (Carnige R-1 University)
OAR: 55
Age: 27
Sex: Male
LORs: Thesis advisor, current teaching supervisor, 3 former professors, current DoD contractor and longtime family friend (former army E-4), former Marine O-3 in the IW community (former student in my micro class)
Work Experience: mainly academic experience with intermediate programming for MS, currently writing a blockchain application for a crypto and blockchain class, formal teaching experience spans 4 years and ages 4 - college students, formerly worked at an environmental testing facility running analyses on water/soil samples (mass spec, GC, TDS, TSS, etc.) for the state and private individuals, and also worked in several academic labs working on projects involving biopolymers and calcium depolarization waves in plants
Waivers: 1
Wishing everyone good vibes! Hopefully everyone finds out sooner than later! ?
How many of those 49 also applied for IP or Intel (ie ‘duplicates’)? And vice versa with the IP/Intel selection percentages.you might find comfort in these numbers.
last board for CW: 20 out of 49 = 40.8%
I’m not exactly sure. Some guy posted these numbers a while back on this thread.How many of those 49 also applied for IP or Intel (ie ‘duplicates’)? And vice versa with the IP/Intel selection percentages.
Congratulations man! Really happy for you.
Now that the IP results are in, I hope we get our CW results soon.
I’m not exactly sure. Some guy posted these numbers a while back on this thread.
I also read somewhere on another thread that every single IWC applicant is considered for intel, CW, and IP regardless of what they put down for their choices.
This was from the last IWC board:I put down 1) IP 2) CW 3) Intel (and 4) SWO) and if everyone is considered for all designators, regardless of choices, wouldn't there be roughly the same number of Y/N across the board for all? Maybe if you put down IP only and didn't get picked up, Intel could snag you? The application / selection difference for Intel and CW suggest more people applied to Intel and weren't considered for CW. I'm not sure how they would compile accurate stats for individual designators if all were considered for each one.
I'm a civ though, so, there's that too. ?
Over the moon right now heard from my recruiter yesterday that I was not selected for CW, but instead for IP which I did not put down as a choice, infact the only thing I put down was CW. I told him yesterday I would call him back a day later and confirm my choice as I had no idea what IP is. I was told today that my class date is April 12th.
This was from the last IWC board:
Yup exactly. I’m assuming this guy clearly didn’t cut it for CW, but the board members realized that he would be well-suited for IP. They didn’t want to see a good candidate go to waste.Seems like there is some wiggle room if a designator wants an applicant that didn't apply for that particular one.
What would be interesting to know is whether that person was considered a nonselect for IP, a select for CW, or both.
Historically the IWC will only pro rec you for 1 designatorSeems like there is some wiggle room if a designator wants an applicant that didn't apply for that particular one.
What would be interesting to know is whether that person was considered a nonselect for IP, a select for CW, or both.