mjv305
ENS SNA
I don't mean to be a jerk but you said its possibly one of the most important things you can do and in reality, the consensus seems to be its useless or, in my opinion, worse than useless.
Yea, definitely didnt say that..
I don't mean to be a jerk but you said its possibly one of the most important things you can do and in reality, the consensus seems to be its useless or, in my opinion, worse than useless.
What if the officer has literally known you for your entire life and writes you an LOR? Would that get tossed or does it actually add some weight to a package?
refer to my earlier post, it goes along with what g7rant63 wrote, as those are near ideal people.What if the officer has literally known you for your entire life and writes you an LOR? Would that get tossed or does it actually add some weight to a package?
It is not from when you went to MEPS, but from when N3M issues a PQ letter, MEPS will have your physical ready for the NRD to send to N3M in around 7 days from the date of physical.So I just got back from the MEPS and everything went very well. I was really surprised when I got to the hotel last evening and was the only officer applicant among 60 or more people. Has anyone, without prior service, that was selected earlier this month received their FS? If so, how long after the day you went to the MEPS did it take to come in and when is your OCS date? Also, if anyone has questions about the physical, it is all fresh in my mind and I would be happy to answer some questions. Thanks.
I understand the sentiment perfectly.
I don't think it says much about a candidate that they went and sought out a person who:
1) Does not personally know them.
2) Likely has no idea what Naval Aviation/OCS is all about and what qualities are necessary to succeed.
The only thing this shows is that the candidate is good at name dropping and possibly trying to one up everyone else with something that is really unimportant. Not that you are not trying to stand out but my argument is that its a poor attempt at standing out. If a candidate is willing to try to make themselves seem better with that tactic, what other tactics might they use once selected? That would be my thought if I was on a board. I don't mean to be a jerk but you said its possibly one of the most important things you can do and in reality, the consensus seems to be its useless or, in my opinion, worse than useless.
Its all about whats required, what else can you do? Everything is a variation on whats "required". I guess the only other advice I could offer is to put alot of thought into your motivational statement. You don't want to come across as arrogant or presumptuous but, at the same time, you want to try and speak to how you can lead effectively. It might seem minor but I agonized over it for quite a while before I had something I liked. I was able to incorporate past experience that jived well with other things the board saw along with some points specific to aviation while still keeping the focus on officer/leader in general, not presuming I'll be lucky enough to make it to a cockpit.
I would not take my advice as gospel, just a few thoughts from somebody who went through the process and overcame some obstacles, it was obviously not a lean board by any stretch so I can't give an honest assessment of how "above and beyond" my package as a whole might have been without seeing how it ranked at board.
March 19th I believeWhen is the next Supply Board this yr?
I got a rough date to attend OCS.. March 25...woohoooo