That Kirov class is pretty badass, and F'ING HUGE! What a beast! It is armed to the f'ing teeth. Of course, it might just explode on its own accord, but impressive none-the-less.
Sorry folks. That's just stupid. Your numbers are not right. Your own statistics are and charts are lying to you, and you don't know enough about the reality of the situation to even see the cracks. The oil is not running out. Politicans are keeping it from us.
Did you read the EIA report, or do you just throw out numbers you like and reject the ones you don't? Nobody disputes that there is an estimated 120 billion barrels there, physically present and capable of being removed. The same EIA study that you dismiss gives a figure of 60 billion barrels in OCS areas alone, matching the numbers you gave.
But out of the 120, only 20 billion or so are "proven", i.e. recoverable under current economic, technological, and regulatory circumstances, and relaxing regulations will not remove the economic and technical obstacles to extracting the remaining 100 billion.
You could wave a magic wand and say "well, there's a lot of it down there, I'm sure we can get it out", or you can quantitatively look at how much is actually recoverable, minus any regulatory obstacles.
So....don't take a quantitative look at the numbers? Take only a look at the numbers that you like?Taking a quantative look at the statistics and definitions and throwing your hands up is exactly what the greenies and the rest of the left want you to do.
No, its oil we're 90% certain we can recover.You don't understand what the definition of a "proven oil reserve" is and how it is being applied to the statistics. A "proven reserve" is not oil that we are 100% certain is there.
That would be a subset deemed Producing Proved Developed Reserves - with the added caveat that there is a pipe there (developed).....and oil is being sucked out(producing).It is a puddle of oil in the ground that has a pipe sticking in it and oil is currently being sucked out of that pipe.
Good point! Those dirty Clinton appointees still screwing us.Keep in mind that the heads of these government agencies like the EIA are appointed by politicians. They are good for raw data, but their estimates on what the private sector can do if allowed are colored by politics and bend in the direction that will make the argument for those who gave them their jobs in the first place.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/contacts/Caruso.htmlIn February 2002, President Bush nominated Guy F. Caruso to the position of Administrator of the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a statistical agency within the United States Department of Energy (DOE) that provides policy-independent data, forecasts and analyses regarding energy. Mr. Caruso has acquired over 30 years of energy experience, with particular emphasis on topics relating to energy markets, policy and security.