BigRed389 said:
What's with the Navy's fucking hardon for computer based training over competent instructors?
Most of the time the course software is broken, errors go for months/years without being corrected, and it's even starting to creep into what should be "serious" training. I stopped by the OS "C" School b/c the course was running adjacent to one I was in and an OS2 on my ship was in it...it was individually paced CBT with CBT testing.
It is everywhere now. 10 years ago in e-nuke school, it was the class, the instructor, and chalk board and books. Now I hear it is death by power point, print out slides and fill in the blanks.
And in prototype it used to be: study material, go down to boat and trace system, enter cubical with salty first class, get hammered with questions, leave with look ups. Now you do a CBT pretest, give results to an instructor who may or may not ask additional questions, and then move along to the next one.
Technology is good, but c'mon..... Standardized CBT is not how I want the guy who may have to save my ass in a casualty trained.
Reading the book and tracing the system, followed by a question answer session and practical evolution to me seems the best way to go. Hmmm kind of sounds like the Aviation pipeline.... Glad I'm here!