Back at the beginning of this thread, kris5505 was pondering his desire to be a Naval Officer in the context of scholarship options, scenarios and opportunities. His ostensible dilemma pushed me to voice an opinion about NROTC scholarships which I have been considering for some time. That opinion is that NROTC scholarships are just not enough.
Neither kris5505 nor any current or prospective NROTC Mid should be in a situation whereby getting from high school to commission is a mostly pay-as-you-go affair. Put another way, an NROTC scholarship should be all tuition and fees without an upper limit for any academic year (maybe limit the number of years to 4 but offer a 5th year for colleges that don't grant academic credit for naval science courses or some science/tech/engineering majors that don't have time to fit in naval science courses inside four academic years); plus a stipend that is more like 25 - 35% of an Ensign's base pay during the academic year; plus room & board for the same number of academic years as the scholarship. This sort of package for a typical 9 month academic year plus 8 weeks of summer cruise (like it used to me up until the post Vietnam era) would be the sort of economic support the Navy ought to offer an NROTC Midn that is transitioning from their high school years to commissioning.
The NROTC Scholarship program, I believe, was envisioned by the Holloway Board (if I've got my history correct) to be designed as an augment to the USNA as a source of Regular Officers (now all are commissioned USN). There was a huge advantage to this concept. The Navy got a source of Regular Officers and they did not have to purchase and operate a four year college. Look at the NROTC summer cruise program from some decades ago, it was an awful lot like that for USNA Midn (minus Plebe Summer; CORTRAMID was Second Class Cruise not Third Class Cruise like today).
Contrast to the USNA Midn, paid 50% of an Ensign's base-pay year round. That's fair. No criticism implied. But what it represents is an economic commitment by the Navy to provide sustainment for that Midn who typically enters after high school and finishes four years later a commissioned officer. The Navy, already benefitting from not having to own and operate another college, should enhance the economic support provided by the NROTC Program to the NROTC Mids who typically enter after high school on their way to commissioning so they can focus almost exclusively on their development as Naval Officers and leaders.
The remarks about picking up a scholarship after the freshman year, what a rip. Is the Navy hedging their bets by gradually shifting scholarships to 3/C Midn because they want to evaluate them after one academic year of college work? If the Navy can do anything exceptionally well, it is evaluate talent. They have the people and the know-how to assess the fitness of high school graduates to enter a commissioning program. They absolutely do not have to wait for them to present one year of college academic work before making the scholarship commitment.
Not to put too fine a point on this but NROTC Midn are manifestly honorable Americans. Their dedication and commitment to their country is certainly more valuable than that of the football player on full scholarship at the same college or university. That football player is indeed entertaining and earns the college large bucks and is deserving. But so is the NROTC Midn deserving of the same sort of scholarship because they will serve their country honorably; will sail or fly in danger as required.
But the Navy is getting an overwhelming bargain with the current NROTC Program. The meagre (by today's standards) scholarship - capped tuition and fees, small stipend, and 4 - 6 week summer cruises - compels the NROTC Midn to sometimes seek other income during the school year (to some extent) and certainly after that all-too-brief summer cruise. That is just not right for a program that portrays itself as preparing Naval Officers. The NROTC Program should have enough economic sustainment so the NROTC Midn can focus all their energies on the requirements of the Program. They can't be funded as if they are on active-duty. I would not advocate that. But I would suggest that the economic sustainment ought to reflect the same commitment from the Navy as is being manifested by the NROTC Midn, committed to honorable service.
This rant has gone on long enough. The Navy gets a tremendous bargain - top notch NROTC Midn, dedicated to service, at a bargain basement cost. The Navy needs to consider upping its commitment to the NROTC Midn.