Got it. I guess they have to take it case by case (major, jobs, LORs, etc). I just find it very very hard to believe that one test, which isn't all that hard, can make up for years of sucking.
I'm not calling you out, I haven't walked in your shoes...I'm speaking in general.
I think it's all important. Even more so for OCS applicants because a lot of people "off the street" are fighting for a limited amount of slots..when you are NROTC (which I was at one time) you know if you finish, you're getting commissioned, you may not get what you want..but you're getting commissioned.
The ASTB as explained to me...think of it this way: You have so many people from varying degrees, varying schools, varying life circumstances..
How else can you compare candidate A and candidate B on a level playing field? The ASTB makes sense. There are no favorites and there are no advantages/disadvantages with a standardized test. For OCS, when you walk in off the street, one of the first things they make you do is take the ASTB..if you don't do well..you get the 'Well I gotta meeting to go to, but what's your number? I'll call you sometime this week to come in and talk."...except they don't call back
I agree as well that the test isn't the most difficult, but obviously it's difficult enough that the average scores are in the 4/5 range. People post on here because they got great scores, but you dont see the hundreds (thousands maybe?) of people that walk into a recruiter station and take the test who got way below what you see here. A larg(er) percentage of people that come on here regularly do get accepted, these are also usually the one's that have great packages. (No, penis jokes)
I will caveat this whole thing by saying...the whole package is important, if you are lacking in one area...really beef up your package in others. Going back to the penis thing....just work out a bunch and buy a big truck.
