Is that what anyone seriously thinks we should do? Mobilize NATO?The mighty NATO forces will not be mobilized......
Is that what anyone seriously thinks we should do? Mobilize NATO?
Yeah, it's been interesting to watch some of the buffoons in the media implying that there's some kind of automatic trigger for Art. 5. WRT to Art 5, it's hard to see how this fighter shoot down would satisfy the requirements, as Turkey itself wasn't attacked. If anything, Art 5 would be much more relevant in the border security issues with Syria. I suspect the NATO meeting will just be to keep all the players informed, not for Turkey to request NATO assistance. I would imagine that such a request would come with an enornous amount of pushback from other member states.Hopefully not, but on BBC today there was an article stating the Turks were requesting a NATO meeting in response to the "Syrian situation". Though overall it looks like they were taking great pains not to let this escalate a few days ago. Now, there were some tougher words being spoken by PM Gul the past day or two. Communication might be breaking down between the two countries over the weekend.
Sorry for launching the link without comment; not sure I had anything smart to say about it.
I think it's an indication of how sensitive the Syrian defense is right now. In other words, it looks like they don't plan on spending too much time trying to identify aircraft before firing. Within the time window it takes to make a shoot/don't shoot decision for an overflying jet, I can't imagine it went too far up the CoC before the missile went up. It appears like the trigger guys had orders along the lines of, "if you see anything come over that horizon, kill it."
Not that I'm trying to defend Syrian Air Defense...but...
The Turkish jet was shot down with AAA which says to me that it was waaaay inside Syrian airspace. Also, if you were the Syrian regime right now, wouldn't you be a bit sensitive to unidentified, fighter sized aircraft in your airspace?