Like I said ........ RTFQ :icon_rastA4sForever said:(present company excluded) ...... :icon_rast
Like I said ........ RTFQ :icon_rastA4sForever said:(present company excluded) ...... :icon_rast
eddie said:What kind of "scary secret stuff" do they have?
I'm not even going to hint at that.eddie said:What kind of "scary secret stuff" do they have?
YesHH-60H said:...but they have several systems in various warfare areas that are a generation better than our version of it.
I wouldn't exactly say that, but I think I know what you mean.HH-60H said:The also have numerous systems that we cannot defeat/defend against yet.
eddie said:What kind of "scary secret stuff" do they have?
Not "your bad" .... learning has taken place ...eddie said:Sorry guys... did not realize that was a can of worms: my bad.
Wow... they must have some really scary stuff.
I've got some knee-jerk opinions ... but lest the AW Ready Room Commandos take another opportunity to jump into old A4's "stuff" again (as they do on frequent occasions when we go posting geo-political) ... I want to read up about these "joint exercises" to get a clearer picture of the scope of it ... I only heard about it on the news. :icon_rastFly Navy said:What do both of you (A4s and Steve) think of the joint Russia/Chinese wargames?
How so? Please enlighten us, oh intel selectee. However one chooses to quibble over numbers, the fact remains that the Chinese military is, in its present state, far from being an offensive force capable of challenging the US. I wouldn't lose any sleep over some kind of Chinese Pearl Harbor reprise.Barnard1425 said:The spending figures the Chinese publish are of dubious accuracy
Fly Navy said:I definitely believe that.
Are they present at the Panama Canal?
Well, I don't know about you, but I'm not going to rely on CNN (or any other mass media source) for an honest assesment of anyone's military capes.Barnard1425 said:Not a genius or an expert, just a bored summer intern who reads the news when his boss isn't looking.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/08/02/china.japan.defense.ap/index.html
"China's own defense reports failed to provide detailed information on plans for equipment procurement and other vital details."