Test guys flying them?
So the rumor says. They are going to use them to clear the missile range... a job currently done by P-3s/C-130s.
Test guys flying them?
This could potentially become the best deal ever....So the rumor says. They are going to use them to clear the missile range... a job currently done by P-3s/C-130s.
No doubt....I suspect that maybe what it takes for the USN to get really serious about ASW....segue/threadjack...has anyone else heard that there is to be no MAD on P-8 now??
SLAM-ER, how did I forget that? I'll admit I wasn't in the fleet when SLAM came around, but it sure seemed like the Hoover/SLAM combo was never used to it's full potential. Let the 3 g Viking stand off and shoot Harpoon and SLAM so there are plenty of pointy nosed jets to go feet dry. Now you have to hold back aircraft better suited for other things to shoot stand off missiles.CAINS II, EFI's, SLAM-ER, other boxes.....it is sad to see her go. At least NASA still flies her!
Playful disagreement is always fun. But in this case I don't see the disagreement. It is a fact that from S-3A to S-3B and sunset, the Viking took on Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar, a better APU, newer avionics, Harpoon, Maverick, refueling pod, and LANTIRN, just off the top of my head. Who could disagree those changes wouldn't make any aircraft more capable and by extension, better.
I'm gonna presume that this "APU" is not what I'm thinking it is......cause the bigger starter motor on my new car really didn't influence my purchase![]()
has anyone else heard that there is to be no MAD on P-8 now??
Until they asked for a show of force that is.![]()
An APU is not a "starter". Your car starter is not critical in an emergency. While a better APU didn't help the Hoover employ weapons, it made it a safer (better) aircraft.