Thanks everyone for keeping it to a good discussion and not a dogpile. I do appreciate it! Next round is on me.
So how do we change our litigious society that wants to legally blame someone when anything goes wrong?
Also- why are we so eager to project what someone may do and hold it against them? Is there a bias there?
And should history matter? This one is tough for me- I don't think that people should be treated differently today for things that they've already been held accountable for and served their sentence for. That's the whole, "equal protection under the law" and due process thing. But I also know that history can be a huge indicator of what may happen.
This also goes into things like, should an excon or felon have to admit that they are one on a job application or interview? I suppose it depends on the crime.
I also think that half of punishment is as a deterrent. I'm not sure that works as well as some may think it does- but I don't have any data to back that up.
So how do we change our litigious society that wants to legally blame someone when anything goes wrong?
Also- why are we so eager to project what someone may do and hold it against them? Is there a bias there?
And should history matter? This one is tough for me- I don't think that people should be treated differently today for things that they've already been held accountable for and served their sentence for. That's the whole, "equal protection under the law" and due process thing. But I also know that history can be a huge indicator of what may happen.
This also goes into things like, should an excon or felon have to admit that they are one on a job application or interview? I suppose it depends on the crime.
I also think that half of punishment is as a deterrent. I'm not sure that works as well as some may think it does- but I don't have any data to back that up.