• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

SWO vs Supply, Pros and Cons: Decisions Decisions

atriste

New Member
Ok, I have had this on my mind for quite some time.

I am trying to decide, if it comes down to it, if I should go Supply or SWO, if I even get selected that is.

Let us just assume that for some reason or another I didn’t get my first choice and was Pro’recd Supply and SWO. Assuming I can pick between my 2nd and 3rd choice?

I made up a personal pro and con list for the respective designator, now this is based purely on my opinion from reading the many posts on AW, NavyOCS and Sailorbob. This list may be useful to others in my situation but please be aware that this is all my personal opinion and as such it may stink. Feel free to comment about my pros and cons for the various communities.

Supply Pros:
1. Let’s assume I have a business degree and a masters: Supply would be a perfect fit for my education

2. From what I have read, some people can’t wait to get into Supply because the community is better, yeah yeah it’s not aviation but w/e (we can’t all wear brown shoes!).

3. Can get warfare qualified, I feel this is nice especially when moving up the ranks.

4. Exposure to lots of communities such as Aviation, Subs, Seabees, SWO, and not to mention logistics, IT and etc…. Makes for an interesting career.

5. Smaller community, this could go either way but I feel you could be more easily recognized for your performance and talents, which means more people in the community know you and come promotion board time, I feel this could help (this is pure speculation on my part).

6. You get to sub-specialize in Supply, such as a 6201 sub-spec which leads to further career development.

7. I feel that there are more possible locations to work (billets), every Navy base has a Suppo around which makes travel opportunities far greater than SWO (again speculation).

8. As mentioned before come shore duty and masters time I already have a master’s that fits perfectly with Supply.

9. Supply provides relevant civilian career experience and could provide a very smooth transition to agencies such as DISA, DLA and others.

10. Lastly, if I got Subs I could serve lamb and be forever known as Ensign Lamb Chops (how great would that be!?!)

Supply Cons:
1. Could possibly be working with disgruntled attrite’s from other communities but I am sure every community has people who are miserable wherever they are.

2. Some Supply jobs are not exactly what I would call glamorous, but like any job take the good with the bad and at most it would only be for a tour (most Supply jobs look interesting).

3. No retention bonus, ($50,000 SWO retention bonus anyone?).

4. Upward mobility restricted to I believe 3 star rank (I know, I know, but I still consider this something to look at when deciding).

5. Cannot command at sea, however you do get shore installation commands, I am not sure how heavily I weigh this con, I am up in the air about it.

6. And lastly, and I would like for someone to comment on this, is Supply looked down on by the URL communities? (I have looked for answers concerning rivalries among the communities but haven’t found much information). This is not much of a factor, if I love my job then I could care less what Goose or Zach Mayo have to say!

SWO Pros:
1. Lots of interesting job opportunities, comm. Officer, cheng, weps and the sorts make for an interesting career.

2. Can lead to interesting joint force and interesting IA assignments (which I would be very up for).

3. SWO is the real Navy, baby!!!!

4. No 6 month school out of OCS, I know there is a SWOS but from what I have read it isn’t 6 months, correct me if I am wrong. Get to hit the fleet immediately. This isn’t a major factor.

5. Lots and lots of leadership potential and responsibility, which Supply also has but in a combat situation I think the SWO Officer would have more responsibility, not bashing Supply at all, just my opinion (feel free to correct me if I am wrong).

6. Can lead to a varied career path, such as mine sweeps, riverine, and alternative career paths.

7. Command at sea and on shore.

8. Sky is the limit for promotions.

9. Large retention bonus (of course I am a business major so I know that there must be a very large reason to have a very large bonus!)

SWO Cons:
1. Hard life as a SWO Officer, I know, no matter what, life is hard and trying as an Officer and a lot is demanded, but from what I have read, most people think SWO’s eat baby SWO’s for breakfast.

2. SWO is not related to my education at all (not a technical or engineering degree).

3. No real quantifiable civilian job experience. I know you get lots of leadership and the quote "We have been doing so much with so little for so long, now we can do anything with nothing”, aptly applies to all SWO Officers. However, I just do not see what hard skills one learns as a SWO that can translate to the civilian world. This however is not a problem if one is a lifer, which I may become. I have read many posts on SB about this so please don’t get hung up on this!

4. Generalist, jack of all trades, master of nothing, (this does not bother me). This is directly opposite of a Supply officer.

5. As with Supply, could be working with officers just itching to LatXfer to Supply, Intel, blah blah blah community and escape all that is SWO.

As you can see, if you take the cons from the pros, SWO and Supply are tied
at +4 pros! Ugh!

At this point I am leaning towards Supply Corps but I have not made up my mind that is of course if my number one designator doesn’t work out. I would also take SWO just as easily. I have not made up my mind if it will be a career or not, if I were to make it a career I feel SWO would be best but if not Supply would clearly win out. Again I can’t possibly make this decision until after I am in the Navy and can decide for myself based on my firsthand knowledge. Take this into consideration when giving advice on the communities. Don’t get me wrong, I feel it would be an extremely high honor to serve as an Officer in the USN and would gladly take whatever they gave me. However, I feel it would be wise to make an informed decision about my future. Ultimately it is my decision on which community to accept but I felt it would be wise to ask the opinion of those currently serving.

Also, good luck to all of those in the application pipeline!

Respectfully,
Atriste
 

navy09

Registered User
None
3. Can get warfare qualified, I feel this is nice especially when moving up the ranks. Doesn't almost every community give out some kind of chest candy these days?

6. You get to sub-specialize in Supply, such as a 6201 sub-spec which leads to further career development. How's this a pro compared to SWO?

7. I feel that there are more possible locations to work (billets), every Navy base has a Suppo around which makes travel opportunities far greater than SWO (again speculation). Never thought of that, you're probably right.

Supply Cons:
1. Could possibly be working with disgruntled attrite’s from other communities but I am sure every community has people who are miserable wherever they are. Disregard. You'll have some of these in almost every community.

3. No retention bonus, ($50,000 SWO retention bonus anyone?). SWO Bonus is $100K :D

4. Upward mobility restricted to I believe 3 star rank (I know, I know, but I still consider this something to look at when deciding). Seriously?

4. No 6 month school out of OCS, I know there is a SWOS but from what I have read it isn’t 6 months, correct me if I am wrong. Get to hit the fleet immediately. This isn’t a major factor. SWOSDOC is 4 weeks.

5. Lots and lots of leadership potential and responsibility, which Supply also has but in a combat situation I think the SWO Officer would have more responsibility, not bashing Supply at all, just my opinion (feel free to correct me if I am wrong). I think Supply officers have just as big divisions as SWOs. SWOs just get to do cooler stuff.



9. Large retention bonus (of course I am a business major so I know that there must be a very large reason to have a very large bonus!) It's got a 4 yr commitment, obviously there's going to be O3 retention issues.

SWO Cons:
1. Hard life as a SWO Officer, I know, no matter what, life is hard and trying as an Officer and a lot is demanded, but from what I have read, most people think SWO’s eat baby SWO’s for breakfast. If you're on a ship, you'll have it just as shitty (maybe worse?) than the SWO Ensigns.

2. SWO is not related to my education at all (not a technical or engineering degree). I'm sure not every chop has a business degree. Can't imagine it's that important in doing what they do.

3. No real quantifiable civilian job experience. I know you get lots of leadership and the quote "We have been doing so much with so little for so long, now we can do anything with nothing”, aptly applies to all SWO Officers. However, I just do not see what hard skills one learns as a SWO that can translate to the civilian world. This however is not a problem if one is a lifer, which I may become. I have read many posts on SB about this so please don’t get hung up on this! SWOs can't go fly for the airlines. I think that's about the only limit to their job opportunities on the outside.

4. Generalist, jack of all trades, master of nothing, (this does not bother me). This is directly opposite of a Supply officer. Indeed, the nature of URL vs. Staff Corps.

I'm commissioning as a SWO in 3 months (big surprise, huh?). Honestly, if I could choose any RL/Staff community, it would probably by Supply...maybe intel.

My only interaction with chops has been on surface ship cruises, so that may have biased me a little. There's no chop JOPA, which kind of sucks, they were kind of off on their own (which could be cool if that's your style).

I don't know...read what everyone has to say...soak it up...do what's right for you.
 

BackOrdered

Well-Known Member
Contributor
All the warfighter vs. pussy stuff sounds nice, but the reality is you will be on the same ships whether you go either way, you will just be accountable for different things. Whether or not the things you are accountable for are things you will actually enjoy doing is what counts. I say you actually research each community first hand and get an idea of a day in their life and see which one you really would rather do. Visit a NROTC and talk to the LTs there, catch a OHARP'd Supply type (they are all over creation lately), visit a Naval base, etc.
 

yohoe

New Member
I'm supply so I'm going to be bias...

2. From what I have read, some people can’t wait to get into Supply because the community is better, yeah yeah it’s not aviation but w/e (we can’t all wear brown shoes!).


When you're attached to an airwing or stationed on a carrier, you can. The CO of NSCS Athens wears his as do all others with their supply wings.

A warfare qual is a requirement. You get reassigned if you can't get it. We have 4 different styles of chest candy (with every suppo over LCDR having 2).

There's a reason why they have a bonus. They need to bribe people to come back

Specialties are when you hit O-4/O-5

You don't need a business degree for supply.

IA's are easy to get into as supply since you'll be doing logistics in the sandbox (or all other IA's for that matter)

Master's are easier to get into for supply (for 810 program) than other communities because the degree pertain to exactly what you'll be doing.

Cant command at sea....oh darn. I was hoping to get fired when my LtJG runs the ship a-ground or some E-3 starts a fire with a cig on my ship...

Supply's school 2 miles from UGA's campus. I'm in stash duty until July and right now, I go in at 0800 and sent home by 0805 unless I have watch once every 2 weeks. Plus tailgating for football games during the season, I live right next to the baseball field, the 20+ bars downtown with the college girls. My 6 month school is going to be 12 months including stash. I wish it was longer.

Everyone I've met in supply are cool. They are not out to kill your career just to get ahead of you.

My LT in OCS was SWO and was getting out. He told me he wished he went to Supply.

After our tour of the USS Cole during OCS, the ensign that gave the tour looked like he wanted to kill himself and when asked if he was going over 4 years, said no. I think the routine 3 hours of sleep helped his decision.

6 classmates that were SWO tried to switch out after that.

We had a LT who taught our moboards getting out the next month. He told us straight up SWO like blows.
 

atriste

New Member
I'm supply so I'm going to be bias...

When you're attached to an airwing or stationed on a carrier, you can. The CO of NSCS Athens wears his as do all others with their supply wings. - Awesome

There's a reason why they have a bonus. They need to bribe people to come back

Cant command at sea....oh darn. I was hoping to get fired when my LtJG runs the ship a-ground or some E-3 starts a fire with a cig on my ship... - LOL

Everyone I've met in supply are cool. They are not out to kill your career just to get ahead of you. - SWO's eat SWO's - confirmed

My LT in OCS was SWO and was getting out. He told me he wished he went to Supply. - Nice

After our tour of the USS Cole during OCS, the ensign that gave the tour looked like he wanted to kill himself and when asked if he was going over 4 years, said no. I think the routine 3 hours of sleep helped his decision. - all I can say is....Damn

6 classmates that were SWO tried to switch out after that. - Damn

We had a LT who taught our moboards getting out the next month. He told us straight up SWO like blows. - Triple Damn
[/font][/size]

Lol,

Well, looks like Supply is still in the lead!
 

BackOrdered

Well-Known Member
Contributor
*alot of words speaking the truth*

+1

*And I wanted so bad to be objective in this thread. But...*

Even my recruiter, a SWO, tried to talk me out of SWO. I did ALOT of my own research on SWO vs. Supply and all the talks I had with priors and active duty end with them trailing off into talking me out of SWO.

Supply life is awesome so far BTW. I have yet to meet a single Supply type regret the community or the lifestyle, though I'm sure there are some.
 

navy09

Registered User
None
Cant command at sea....oh darn. I was hoping to get fired when my LtJG runs the ship a-ground or some E-3 starts a fire with a cig on my ship...

I think it's quotes like this that makes people (me, at least) not want to have anything to do with the non-URL types. You're a military officer! Why don't you want command??

That said, while we're on the topic of random people we've met that hate their job...I had both Supply O-1s on LCC-19 tell me that they hated supply and they were trying to switch to SWO...

The SWO adviser at my ROTC unit went through OCS, was a Supply officer (DISBO on a CG) and switched over to SWO because he hated supply...

I met an -18 pilot last summer on cruise who was getting our because he was sick of his job and wanted to do something engineering related (no kidding)...

Dumb anecdotes like that prove nothing. There's no guarantee that you won't be dealt a crappy hand in whatever community you go into.
 

swerdna

Active Member
None
Contributor
I'm really suprised that there's this much of a debate between SWO and Supply. But then again, I'm biased.

Here's a conversation that took place on USS Lastship between a chief and the Disbo:

Chief: Disbo, you seem like a smart young officer...why did you go Supply? Are you colorblind?

Disbo (looking down): Yes...

On a more serious note, how is it that Supply will look better on a resume than SWO? I can understand if you are going to be applying for a job in a warehouse or working in the import/export business (with Art Vandelay, perhaps?) Being in the military looks good, but I'd imagine any officer position would be great on a resume. Employers are probably looking for management skills.
 

BackOrdered

Well-Known Member
Contributor
I think it's quotes like this that makes people (me, at least) not want to have anything to do with the non-URL types. You're a military officer! Why don't you want command??

He never said he didn't want command. He said "command at sea." And I stand by the opinion that there are communities in the Navy and there is what you would enjoy actually committing the next 8 to 20 years doing. As I said originally, the original poster needs to speak to his recruiter about talking to guys in the respective communities he is considering and decide what he will be happy doing. Command at sea may or may not be one of them.
 

yohoe

New Member
Speaking for myself, I do want to command but commanding a ship isn't something I really care for. We are still have 20+ (depending on the platform) sailors under us on our first operational tour.

I went supply in the navy because I wanted to do business. I didn't want to be a pee-on in some fortune 500 company until I got my MBA. I thought about SWO but was turned away by others.

Another thing that helped me decide (from wikipedia):

Notable U.S. Navy Supply Corps Officers

I know there are many people who prefer SWO. That's great, someone has to do it and like the challenge. For others, it's not what they are interested in. They would rather do other aspects that all go towards the same mission. This was my 2 cents on the subject.
 

swerdna

Active Member
None
Contributor
Speaking for myself, I do want to command but commanding a ship isn't something I really care for. We are still have 20+ (depending on the platform) sailors under us on our first operational tour with the number increasing with experience.

I went supply #1 because I wanted to do business. I didn't want to be a pee-on in some fortune 500 company until I got my MBA.

Another thing that helped me decide (from wikipedia):

Notable U.S. Navy Supply Corps Officers

I know there are many people who prefer SWO. That's great, someone has to do it and like the challenge. For others, it's not what they are interested in. They would rather do other aspects that all go towards the same mission. This was my 2 cents on the subject.

Looks like some citations are needed...
 
Top