FlyingOnFumes
Nobel WAR Prize Aspirant
I wonder how many HUD / Glass Cockpit "Cripples" this is going to create...
Is it next week? Seemed to me that the T-6B was like a mirage, the closer you got to it the more it seemed to drift away.
I still think they should just build new T-34's. Primary didn't need anything fancier than that for the basics.
T-34 is too basic....
The lack of beta is bad IMO.
WOW! VT tour doesn't sound so bad anymore for a future shore tour.
Do you just sit at home w/ a notebook and try and think up absurd statements and then write them down or is it all off the cuff?
That basic airplane can give me one hell of a helmet fire.
T-34 is too basic....this cockpit of the B looks a bit advanced for primary though. We could still be flying the Yellow Peril if basic is what we wanted. The T-6A I thought would have been a better choice. The ejection seats, the canopy view and protection, cost per flight hour, etc, etc makes a better airplane than the 34. The lack of beta is bad IMO.
I'm a believer in the T-6. I loved it, but I'm partial too. It is a cross country machine, fun to fly, capable, has ejection seats, and best of all: new. Why reopen a production line for something that is old as dirt and won't keep up with where Naval Aviation is headed, rather than where it's been?
I think all the bells and whistles were built into the B's with a mind to go back to a primary - intermediate type syllabus, but that's baseless speculation based on something I think I might have read...it was floating around in the ether up there, so what better place to spew it than AW?
My old bud Kiko, in charge of the transition at Whiting, had said their goal is build an intermediate syllabus for those who select tailhook. Using the HUD, stepping up the speed in breaks and such, etc, etc.
What are typical instrument approach speeds in a the 45? Everything prior to the flaps and gear in the T-6 was flown at 200.