I will say, having seen some VR/AR training devices that didn’t really meet expectations, these 73 AR PTTs are pretty excellent.
I will say, having seen some VR/AR training devices that didn’t really meet expectations, these 73 AR PTTs are pretty excellent.
Having obviously not seen the ones that didn't make the cut, the ones that are actually getting implemented in the VTs have been pretty good. I wasn't in Avenger but found the VR T-6 sleds very useful for learning course rules and practicing form procedures, the AR T-44 checklist trainer was very good at showing what the FTI explained poorly, and the T-45 VR sleds seem well done and have been incorporated into the new syllabus. Helo stud bros rant and rave about those AR TH-73 sleds. Hopefully Big Navy doesn't do away with FTDs/OFTs/UTDs, but I've really enjoyed the proliferation of these lower fidelity trainers in the fixed wing VTs.I will say, having seen some VR/AR training devices that didn’t really meet expectations, these 73 AR PTTs are pretty excellent.
Compared to the apparently primitive cockpit of the TH-57’s I flew back in the 1986/87 timeframe these things are space ships! Add to that the “connectivity” of the training pipelines. When I arrived to Milton from Corpus I knew nothing and they treated me accordingly. There was no knowledge hand down so the opening phase of training was the most difficult for me. Add to that the addition of NVG and rescue training and I’m impressed.Nice video segment on the current state of HT ops w/ the Thrasher. Some great shots of the flight deck displays - nice to see the ability to display DoD FLIPS on MFD.
The PFD attitude display is a little complex/busy but I'm sure a number of requirements drove this (and I know the dude who personally designed the layout, and he's pretty sharp)
Anyways, give it a watch and please share your comments here in the thread.
I tested (i.e.: one time and gave my feedback on a sheet of paper) one of the initial proptypes of these. I was shocked at how much better it was than the traditional sim in most respects.
Or anywhere…if you actually are flying tactically, your patches should all be removed.I remember how jealous ENS me was that VT-2 had cool subdued patches and we didn't over at VT-3. And now CDR(ret) me realizes just how goofy subdued patches in the TRACOM really are.
Kind of out the back gate, you can see roughly the area if you look on Google maps.Just wondering, where on the base are they building it?
Just wondering, where on the base are they building it?