I like this a lot! My guess is there is a lot of truth to it..
Edited due to copyright concerns
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9015839
I have dealt with the RF spectrum enough to realize that funny things can happen with devices which transmit and the frequencies they transmit on. We saw some funky things on the EP-3 that we could not figure out how or why something ended up on a particular frequency (though often it could be explianed when something would show up a frequency double or triple the original one, I forget off the top of my head what it is called?). One of the strangest signals we got we did figure out but still could not explain how it happened or why it looked just like a threat radar. One thing to remember is that we were dealing with the raw and unprocessed signals that the rest of you see with your RHAW gear, thoguh even those often pick up erroneous signals.
My point is that transmission devices do some unexpected things sometimes and I think it is better to be safe than sorry. It would take a lot of money and a lot of testing to make sure that cell phones do not interfere with all the different types of equipment from all the different manufacturers and all the different planes to figure out what would happen to all of them. Who would pay for it? You?