I hear you, sir....but it's alarming to see people so reliant on the automatic functions.
Really nice bit of technical reporting/story telling by the NYT - on the Lion Air 737 mishap. Even @HAL Pilot would give praise to this level of technical accuracy
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/12/26/world/asia/lion-air-crash-12-minutes.html
I hope you were being sarcastic.... That article is soooo incomplete.Really nice bit of technical reporting/story telling by the NYT - on the Lion Air 737 mishap. Even @HAL Pilot would give praise to this level of technical accuracy
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/12/26/world/asia/lion-air-crash-12-minutes.html
No kidding. I’m no big bus driver, but this looks like they forgot some pretty important fundamentals.That's sad something so simple killed so many people. I've never flown a big, automated airplane....but it's alarming to see people so reliant on the automatic functions.
... as long as you follow the maintenance manual and don't skip steps.The reliability of the planes and automation is what keeps more of these type of incidents from happening in the third world.
The irony of this is the fact that the technology Boeing employed to save 3rd world pilots is what ended up killing them.The automation is there to make these planes safe enough for a 200 hour Ethiopian or Chinese guy to fly it and get it from point a to point b without crashing. Boeing sells a ton of these...look at their order sheet and you'll see the majority of these sales are outside the US. Southwest is #1 for MAX orders, followed by 4 foreign carriers, two leasing companies and then United at #7.
When the automation doesn't behave as expected, combined with any other contributing factor, in addition to a minimally trained bus driver....expect marginal results. The reliability of the planes and automation is what keeps more of these type of incidents from happening in the third world.
It's ironic in this case but the number of times it has saved them over the years probably numbers many, many times.The irony of this is the fact that the technology Boeing employed to save 3rd world pilots is what ended up killing them.
The particular system in question didn’t exist before the max, so I doubt it’s saved many, if any.It's ironic in this case but the number of times it has saved them over the years probably numbers many, many times.
The irony of this is the fact that the technology Boeing employed to save 3rd world pilots is what ended up killing them.