Or don’t. I’m sure she’s tired of storytelling. Leave her alone.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
UFOs?
- Thread starter nittany03
- Start date
No Longer in Shadows, Pentagon’s U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public (Published 2020)
For over a decade, the program, now tucked inside the Office of Naval Intelligence, has discussed mysterious events in classified briefings.
Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles Not Made on This Earth'
Bombshell: The government’s once-clandestine UFO program will reveal findings on unexplained materials and crashes.
TL;DR: Per open sources, the Office of Naval Intelligence now runs the UAPTF, and an astrophysicist contractor (?) for the DoD UAP program mentioned physical evidence of “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”
I believe it. For it to not be true would be very un-2020 of this year.
That’s a fucking stretch. I can’t identify this material... therefore it is “not of this earth.” I cannot roll my eyes any more dramatically.No Longer in Shadows, Pentagon’s U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public (Published 2020)
For over a decade, the program, now tucked inside the Office of Naval Intelligence, has discussed mysterious events in classified briefings.www.nytimes.com
Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles Not Made on This Earth'
Bombshell: The government’s once-clandestine UFO program will reveal findings on unexplained materials and crashes.www.popularmechanics.com
TL;DR: Per open sources, the Office of Naval Intelligence now runs the UAPTF, and an astrophysicist contractor (?) for the DoD UAP program mentioned physical evidence of “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”
I don’t understand why you’re so keen on buying this trash reporting.
I agree a lot of the reporting is sensationalist - but not all of it. There are credible accounts from Sex, as well as an OS3 who was onboard the Nimitz that day and claims to have watched a different, higher-res video in CVIC than the one publicly released. If we aren’t curious for human history’s sake, the technology of the “tic tac” would at minimum have national security implications, especially if it turns out to be a manmade aircraft invented by Russia or China.
Sigh . . . an 18XX of all people should understand that any credible analysis of such a thing, if it exists, would be SAPed up the wazoo for incredibly obvious reasons.
Yeah I'm plenty curious as to what's going on with these...but I'm not sure what the value of that is if the only conclusion remains "we have no idea what this is." Even if these were interstellar visitors, there's precious little we could realistically do about it one way or the other until they decide to do us a solid and crash one into Area 51 to study.
As for manmade tic tac theories, I have a hard time buying that Russia or China is going to go and take their UFO prototype and run it around in the SOCAL OPAREA for the entire US Navy to see.
Now you’re mixing different incidents together, as though they’re related. Why are you so hell bent on the SOCAL Nimitz stuff being extraterrestrial? That is a foolish position to take, particularly for someone in your field. It also makes zero sense that an adversary would trot out this kind of capability. OPSEC isn’t just something that the US practices. This is an unhealthy obsession for you.
Last edited:
Why would the Pentagon publicly release videos and reports of its own SAP program? I agree that credible analysis should be done behind closed doors, but the NY Times is now reporting that the Pentagon intends to release some of its analysis.
They're the same event. The OS3 was discussing the same incident where CDR Fravor was vectored to take a look.
I didn't say it's extraterrestrial for certain - but it's a remote possibility, and the Pentagon and Congress want to identify it.
Cool. It would be more foolish for the intelligence field writ-large to be content not knowing. Recognition of vehicles is a job of intel. So is preventing strategic surprise.
First you find it odd that a non-earth vehicle is even considered on a list of possibilities, then you say it makes zero sense it could be Russian or Chinese.
From reading this post, it’s clear to me that you’re very confused about the topic being discussed.
Just because the NYT says that some of the analysis is being released doesn’t mean that there will be anything remotely sensitive (or interesting) in that release (assuming no errors with the reporting to begin with).
The only reason that anything has been released thus far is because someone who has declassification authority reviewed all of those videos and reports and determined that they were not of any value.
Personally, I’m content to wait until actual data is declassified decades from now (if ever) ala Constant Peg, instead of trying to parse words from Popular Mechanics, The Drive, and the NYT so I can figure out where the little green men are hiding.
Last edited:
Unless the "Tic Tack" is deemed racist, the Grey Lady will soon lose interest.
Fair enough, no bombshells, but aviation stuff is more interesting to me than COVID statistics, mask rules, Fauci conspiracies, Portland riots, BLM, or the Washington Football Team name.
The thread title says it all.