Thisguy said:I read D-Lux's post, and while calling you a D-bag may have been over the top, he's was trying to drive home the point that an Ensign is an Ensign. Period.
You sir are a D-bag, and a fu**tard.
That may have been over the top (or not,) but I'm just trying to drive home a point so I guess it's OK. Period. In the meantime, nobody call me out on it because afterall, I'm simply making a point and i dnot rellay nkow hwo to writwe wlel.
See how biased that is? I know you love ROTC...bravo. I didn't criticize you for standing up for ROTC, so don't criticize others for standing up for the Academies. It's awfully convenient to tell others to "fix your attitude" instead of confronting the real issues and addressing the points that have been made.
And the point IS: (drum roll) Although you get the same commission through the various commissioning sources, there are countless factors that play into what separates an Academy from University ROTC. To simply use the end-state as a crux for one over the other is both naive and ill-advised. For the high school student considering which route to go, he needs to consider more than just the commission...he needs to consider which is a better match for him, which offers the most opportunities for growth and advancement, which will offer classmates that he can be proud to call classmates, etc. etc. This issue is extremely complicated, and it's a joke to simply say, "duh drink beer, have woman, go ROTC and get the same commission." That ignores all the real issues and is no help to anybody. And it really gets annoying when multiple ROTC kids jump in to repeat the SAME EXACT spiel over and over again: beer, women, freedom. Tell me something we don't know. Now let's go into what advantages the Academies have to offer, without accusing others of having an attitude problem. Note the title of the thread: USNA or ROTC...NOT "What happens once you graduate from USNA or ROTC?"