Dems have 3. FDR, JFK and Truman. As for Lincoln, even being the first Republican President, both parties now sorta see him as their own.Interestingly, of the Presidents who have carriers bearing their names, Republicans outnumber Democrats 6 to 2 (only counting JFK once).
Don't forget our one "Independent"…GW.Dems have 3. FDR, JFK and Truman. As for Lincoln, even being the first Republican President, both parties now sorta see him as their own.
Maybe that named her that because she doesn't have any guns?
Like him or not, he is the President and served two terms. It will happen.
I don't know. Still waiting on the USS Nixon, and USS Wilson. And they were both two-term, wartime presidents.
I'll give you Nixon, but Wilson , for all of his faults (horrible racist jackass), the Germans and the Japanese put the world on the path to WWII. Naming ships for our Navy is political. Whether after States, Cities, or for a President (or John Stennis), its political. I wish we were more like the RN in ship naming......HMS Battleaxe is bad ass.who almost single-handedly began American isolationism and put the world on the path to WW2.
I'll give you Nixon, but Wilson , for all of his faults (horrible racist jackass), the Germans and the Japanese put the world on the path to WWII. Naming ships for our Navy is political. Whether after States, Cities, or for a President (or John Stennis), its political. I wish we were more like the RN in ship naming......HMS Battleaxe is bad ass.
I think their problem goes well beyond the naming of ships.The counter-argument about Her Majesty's Navy and its badass ship names is that maybe if they were more politically savvy in naming their ships, they'd have more ships to name.