About a week ago an 8 year boy in my neighborhood stuck his head in a running lawnmower his father was fixing in the garage.
I see your point. It’s not guns or lawn mower fixin.’ It’s parental control. Seriously… what do we do?
Steve
About a week ago an 8 year boy in my neighborhood stuck his head in a running lawnmower his father was fixing in the garage.
So could an eleven year old with a pack of matches.
True. But the neighbor with a ZU-23 could take out several neighbors, the cop cars and the police helo that show up to see what was going on.
I see your point. It’s not guns or lawn mower fixin.’ It’s parental control. Seriously… what do we do?
Steve
YOU NAILED IT!!!!!
Its education, safety awareness, and mature decision making.
Hell even fireworks could be safe if people realized they are God Damn explosives wrapped in paper. Every year we toss em to our kids after guzzling a few beers with the mantra "don't do anything stupid". Several of them lose fingers and have their faces ruined for life.
The BoyScouts taught me safe and respectful handling of firearms.
You can go to www.nraila.org to find tons of free material for families.
Maybe we should pass a law making it illegal to use a gun while committing a crime. Better yet make it against the law to murder someone period. That should pretty much take care of the whole problem.
By the way I want me one of them ZU-23's. Sounds like fun!
Flash,
We could start a thread about shitpaper. Two ply or Quilted? No doubt you could find a good argument even on that subject my friend. You have a gift.
Z
Our friend Zissou invited me to join this discussion.
My father invented the Barrett Model 82 .50 caliber rifle and introduced it for sale in 1982. His motivation for designing this rifle was purely related to his hobby of shooting. Though no one realized it at the time, his invention went on to become a useful piece of equipment for our military, and allies.
From a practical standpoint, it has benefited our country that free people like Ronnie Barrett, with no taxpayer funding where able to take an interest in guns and later design an innovative new tool to help move us forward. This would have never happened had he been subject to restrictions on things like legal machineguns, "sniper rifles", and the like. Owning and using guns sparks creativity for design, just as a car designer has surely spent a lot of time driving many cars.
That is a logical, practical argument that is easy to understand for most..
There has been talk about the true intent of the Second Amendment. Having studied the big picture, and considering the context in which it was written, it is plainly clear to me. The men who formed our government wanted no disparity of force between those who served in government and those who are subject to their leadership and decisions. The final check and balance that protects our consitutional republic from slipping towards other less desirable forms of government.
Fast forward to today. Our society is incredibly peaceful by all standards of the world. Law abiding, respectful people own millions of guns in this country, though most of them never harm anyone. More children are injured by backyard trampolines than an irresponsibly stored firearm.
That is a hard question to ask because the possible answers are all frightening. All of the scenarios point to a sinister motive of the group that wants complete control, un-questioned obediance, and ALL of the power. Why?
If you don't understand why regualar citizens have the right to own a .50 caliber rifle, please, at least get to know some who do. You will meet some people who have a passion for their hobby, and are generally very patriotic. Many of them like Ronnie Barrett will have a great love for this country and a desire to serve those who risk everything in defense of our nation.
Me too! Looks like fun to me.
Um, we tried all that shit about "using a gun while commiting a crime," not to mention that "murder" shit... never stuck though. the assholes still got off.
Steve
Two words for you Sir : California Wildfires
I think that the argument that less guns equates to greater control over a populace is a false one anyways. Looking at the democracies that have put very restrictive rules on gun ownership, they are no less free since they have restricted guns than before, if they ever had large scale gun ownership to begin with. Is Finland mroe free than its neighbors? Or is Yemen?
Switzerland. You know the country with the highest percentage of gun ownership in the world....they have gun crime that is so low statistics aren't kept. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1566715.stm
I'd say that's a better model than trying to prevent people from obtaining certain firearms. Requiring that they are trained in how to use them.