Terrorists live in the space between where laws hold and where wars hold. The Wild Wild Wests.Terrorism is a law enforcement problem.
Terrorists live in the space between where laws hold and where wars hold. The Wild Wild Wests.Terrorism is a law enforcement problem.
No no no... you see, when someone repeats the slogan "from the river to the sea," it means that they support Palestine's existence as a nation and not the extermination of all Jews in the region. Why can't you understand? /sYeah, I really don’t understand where it comes from. Seems to run on both sides of the political aisle too, although I saw more antisemitic attitudes when I lived in the northeast than I have living in other regions of the US.
Gaza is part of Israel in all but name. Israel controls the supplies going to it, it controls the comings and goings of the population, etc. There is not currently a 2 state solution in place, which means there is 1 state: Israel.Gaza has never been a part of Israel. It was occupied by them for years, but has never a part of Israel and the people there were never considered Israeli by them or anyone else.
Yes, and if a small minority of them attacked us then we would not be justified in slaughtering the lot of them.We did. They were called Native Americans and we sent them to live on reservations. To a lesser extent, there was also the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII.
Gaza is part of Israel in all but name. Israel controls the supplies going to it, it controls the comings and goings of the population, etc. There is not currently a 2 state solution in place, which means there is 1 state: Israel.
Israel is responsible for the people of Gaza. They have said that themselves. Hell, the Israeli government has been giving money and support to Hamas for years. That's why I say "their people" attacked them. Gaza is not a separate state... it is a part of the Israeli state, no matter how inconvenient that may be.Ummmm…Egypt?
To go from there to saying their own people attacked them is stretching it, to say the least.
Yeah, I really don’t understand where it comes from. Seems to run on both sides of the political aisle too, although I saw more antisemitic attitudes when I lived in the northeast than I have living in other regions of the US.
To use the same exact vernacular, only a 'small minority' of Palestinians have been killed, which is a far cry from 'slaughtering the lot of them'.Yes, and if a small minority of them attacked us then we would not be justified in slaughtering the lot of them.
I don't get your point.
Did you understand my point?To use the same exact vernacular, only a 'small minority' of Palestinians have been killed, which is a far cry from 'slaughtering the lot of them'.
Did you understand mine?Did you understand my point?
That you didn't like my verbiage and want to play word games vice actually talk about the substance of my points?Did you understand mine?
So that would be a no... My point is that the premise of your analogy is flawed doesn't accurately describe what is happening in Gaza. Thus, any conclusion you would draw from your hypothetical is pretty irrelevant. I'd argue your verbiage is significantly more biased than it needs to be, that wasn't actually my point.That you didn't like my verbiage and want to play word games vice actually talk about the substance of my points?
If Israel could ensure that Pk on Hamas = 1.0 and Pk on civilians = 0.0, it would. Unfortunately, Hamas thrives by hiding its militants in populous areas to win the messaging war on social media.So that would be a no... My point is that the premise of your analogy is flawed doesn't accurately describe what is happening in Gaza.
That you didn't like my verbiage and want to play word games vice actually talk about the substance of my points?