Old 46D Crewchief 90-93. Now the black bus. Bigger doesn't always equate to better...if you were wondering.
WRT the linked page, lots of stuff fails OPEVAL and still makes it to the fleet. There is a lot more to it than simply saying, "Well, the spec says cruise at 275 kts, but we can only do 255, so we'll just sh!tcan the whole design and go back to the drawing board." I understand that this isn't the thrust of the thread, but people need to understand that there are competing interests involved in the equation, and sometimes getting a usable (albeit imperfect) product out to fleet end users is preferable to no product at all, or additional cost over-runs. Things can get fixed down the road as required. That's what AFCs and software upgrades are for. [/rant]
Brett
GMI teaches strive for #1, but realize when #2 will meet the need.
Writing realistic specs helps too. Marketing / Styling ALWAYS will promise/design stuff that cannot be delivered:
As fast as they want it
As cheap as they need it
That can be reasonably produced in time.
It's called a pinnacle landing and it's NOT the the most difficult thing to do - especially if you have a decent crewman giving you good voice commands on the position of the ass end of the aircraft. The Phrog and Chinook excel at this kind of thing and from a piloting perspective it's one of the features of the aircraft design that make this pretty routine.
It looks way more dramatic than it really is, trust me.
Do you mean in order to accomplish the mission? I used to do them every chance I got for a photo op, but have only done them a sum total of twice for mission accomplishment.I know that we train for pinnacle landings... but how often do we actually do them... I'd love to hear some stories about those...