As someone who was medically qualified for Pilot and chose the NFO route, my 12 years of experience as an NFO has validated that choice. There's a lot of discussion in several threads on AW about SNFOs fleeting up to SNA based on performance in API. This kind of thing ebbs and flows with requirements, so don't count on it if you've set your sights on being a pilot. I had the benefit of being enlisted Aircrew in the VP community where I could see the roles of both Pilots and NFOs. I'm also now in a community that is very NFO-centric (and will continue to be even with the designator pairity for the Growler).Here's one for you, sir...
I've heard a little scuttlebutt from a couple SNFOs I know further down the pipeline than I am that some students are being offered the chance to switch to pilot at the end of API if they do well enough. Regardless of whether it's true or not...if you were offered the chance to switch while you were in flight school, and you were medically qualified, would you go SNA instead?
As someone who was medically qualified for Pilot and chose the NFO route, my 12 years of experience as an NFO has validated that choice. There's a lot of discussion in several threads on AW about SNFOs fleeting up to SNA based on performance in API. This kind of thing ebbs and flows with requirements, so don't count on it if you've set your sights on being a pilot. I had the benefit of being enlisted Aircrew in the VP community where I could see the roles of both Pilots and NFOs. I'm also now in a community that is very NFO-centric (and will continue to be even with the designator pairity for the Growler).
Whether SNA or SNFO is right for you depends on you. There's obviously a lot of designator bravado that occurrs in the training environment (even from your instructors), so take things you hear with a grain of salt. If you're fundamentally wed to the idea of being at the controls of your aircraft, then perhaps SNA is what you should strive for. After being in this business for almost 22 years, I know that moving stick, rudder and throttle are just one of many skillsets that all aviators employ in the completion of their assigned missions. Much of the time, flying the aircraft is more of a background, autonomic task that takes second seat to mission oriented tasks. Communications, weapons employment, systems knowledge, decision-making and critical analysis of information are the foci of what Naval Aviation is actually all about. What gets done with stick and rudder is just incidental to all of that.
Brett
I'm almost through with IFS now...maybe this can be chalked up to having absolutely no prior flight experience, but after spending a little time with stick and rudder I'm much more interested in the mission-oriented tasks. Sometimes I wonder if I'm one of the few, but I think I'll be happier as an SNFO.
That's true. I'm still at the point where every time I land and something doesn't fall off of the airplane I wonder what I did right and if I can do it again.
The Whidbey area and Pac NW in general are great, one of the most beautiful places on this planet and particularly spectacular to fly in - the low level routes through the cascades are world famous. If you're into the outdoors, you've got water, mountains and everything in between. Great skiing, fishing boating, etc. Now, Whidbey isn't known for it's hopping night life or hordes of hot single chicks, but Seattle and Vancouver are just a couple hours away. It's home and I miss it.![]()
Whidbey was a big reason I wanted to take a shot at jets back in Primary. The northwest is very alluring. Too bad helo guys can't get sent out that way on a normal career track.