Well good news for people that want back to back to back flying orders. They have no other option to man squadrons.I think he's going for "fly until they won't let me anymore," based off of my conversations with him.
Well good news for people that want back to back to back flying orders. They have no other option to man squadrons.I think he's going for "fly until they won't let me anymore," based off of my conversations with him.
Personally I’d choose based on mission, duty station, and health of the fleet.
Hornets needed significant overhauls to extend their service life from the original 6000 planned flight hours to 8000 or 10000. Sequestration screwed that plan up pretty badly. The result is that the hornet fleet is in sad shape. The harrier has always been a maintenance nightmare but it’s about the same as it’s always been. It doesn’t have the same fatigue issues that the legacy hornets do.In the VT's we've heard the Harrier guys say that due to depot level mx Harriers are much healthier than Hornets. Is there going to be "depot level" mx on Hornets anytime soon? Anyone currently in Hornet squadrons that can provide current insight?
Hornets needed significant overhauls to extend their service life from the original 6000 planned flight hours to 8000 or 10000. Sequestration screwed that plan up pretty badly. The result is that the hornet fleet is in sad shape. The harrier has always been a maintenance nightmare but it’s about the same as it’s always been. It doesn’t have the same fatigue issues that the legacy hornets do.
Well those are all comforting facts (sarcasm). Thanks for the input though. Also this is probably more interesting to the OP but this slideshow has some interesting info (I.E. the plan to have all Harriers consolidated on the east coast by 2022. Slide 23). Also a lot of Pentagon planning numbers and acronym shenanigans, just a fair warning. Maybe have a beer on hand to read this one.
http://www.aviation.marines.mil/Portals/11/2018 AvPlan .pdf
I’d expect harriers to stick around longer than that. There may have already been an announcementWell those are all comforting facts (sarcasm). Thanks for the input though. Also this is probably more interesting to the OP but this slideshow has some interesting info (I.E. the plan to have all Harriers consolidated on the east coast by 2022. Slide 23). Also a lot of Pentagon planning numbers and acronym shenanigans, just a fair warning. Maybe have a beer on hand to read this one.
http://www.aviation.marines.mil/Portals/11/2018 AvPlan .pdf
Never underestimate the sheer joy of being a patch-wearing O-4 Coffee Mess Treasurer. You can ask some of the "first cadre" Tomcat guys.Yes and no. Better than having no jet? Yes, obviously. Good for making command? Not really, with a ridiculous number of patch wearing majors in that community.
I went through that last weekend. Definitely some interesting stuff if it all comes through (like RNAV approaches to F18s this FY).
Presumably, it will be like what we already have in the Rhino. There’s no vertical component, so you more or less get TACAN mins, though sometime it’s slightly better than that.That could be real nice, especially if has whatever the GPS approaches with vertical guidance are called, making it similar to ILS.
one of his Hornet squadrons in Miramar actually had 25ish hours/ month per pilot recently.
Maybe on UDP if they included the TRANSPAC.
Don't think for one minute that those aren't cherry picked numbers. Hornet bubbas are not getting 25 hours a month at home- unless one guy who was the sole section/division lead/NSI/LATTI was abused and flown every day he could be...
That MAG CO wants to make sure you don't quit before you get to him. Go find your closest IP who flew Hornets and ask him if any of his buddies got 25 hours last month.
That could be real nice, especially if has whatever the GPS approaches with vertical guidance are called, making it similar to ILS.
The lack of civilian ILS in the Hornet is something I will never understand and I’ve never heard a good explanation for it. I’ve cancelled so many sorties for weather where if we had ILS we could have gone flying. I don’t understand why, with a platform that already has trouble with availability, you don’t provide it with a simple upgrade like ILS to increase the amount of fly days.
If the 2020-2021ish radar upgrade happens that would be huge too. Mech scan is no way to live life these days, I couldn’t imagine rolling around with an APG-65/73 in 2028.