gatordev said:
I think that's always been the question ($100 hammer). I'm sure there's lots of "answers" on the 'net somewhere. Part of it, though is that you're not just paying for the part, you're paying for all the testing/MILSPEC/additional costs to the manufacture that it took to get you said part.
Although I still don't know why a 10 cent stainless fastener costs more than a dollar...
Well this is very true. I worked at NASA for a time, researching and buying ele parts for spacecraft, and you can get a part at radio shack for .35 cents, but its space rating can make it cost 30$ When you cant bring a spacecraft back from venus to replace the 35 cent part it gets important to make sure its not going to fail, We would take the testing (which was part specific) buy 100 of the parts, life test 5, fail test 5, use 5 (1 on spacecraft one on engineering model, one on proof of concept, and some backup) and the rest would go into stock, as there are minimum buys of parts. so for a 35 cent part the cost could be 35$ X 100 + data + in house testing, only to find out that the requirements changed and we had to change parts so they all went to stock (which costs money to store in space rating)
But this is not venus, I guess I should know why things cost so much better than most, but I still cant see 180k for a canopy. One of a kind mission specific hand made/high tech made components, dont usually cost this much.