To make sure I'm understanding this correctly: 'Graduate GPA of 3.0+ from a conferred degree supersedes a lower undergrad GPA' doesn't mean that the numerical value of the former will replace the numerical value of the latter, but rather that it will simply make you eligible for Intel. The actual GPA value the board evaluates is the average of the two?
So if you have graduate-level credits, but haven't completed the degree yet, do they count for nothing when determining eligibility (i.e. won't bring up a below-minimum undergrad GPA)? If that's the case, it would seem a bit uneven if standalone undergrad credits earned after completing a bachelor's are counted in and can be used to reach the minimum required GPA. (And I say this as someone who is using that method to qualify.) I suppose, however, that they are still technically "undergrad".
Yes to your first paragraph. I think your hinting at your undergrad not being consider.... they are going to know your undergrad GPA and it will be considered total person concept. Your Masters qualified you to be looked at thus having the masters fulfilled the requirement of the bachelors. If you don't have your masters but you have some grad course complete well guess what you don't have a masters and if your bachelors does not qualify you than you don't qualify for the board. If you have grad classes and no masters yet those classes will be calculated into your GPA.
Bottom line any schooling you have done will be looked at everything is considered.