It has to do with typical SOP in that situation. Basic premise used by most departments is to courdon and contain around the area involved to prevent the shooter from fleeing or moving to a new area to inflict damage. There is some good reasoning about this, it allows for good officer communication and provides informations for the Commander on scene to be able to build a picture of the scenario. Unfortunately its an adaptation of doctrine used for hostage scenarios its slow as hell and doesnt work in a situation with an active shooter who is not concerned with survival/escape.
Could they have done it differnt, sure they could but we dont have the same informations the officers did at the time they were making decisions out there in the field therefor we deffinately dont have any right to pass judgement on the actions of the officers.
Heck, yes we do. Gunshots in the building= go in and kill, not sit outside and wait. There were plenty on scene, from what I could tell, to contain while others went in. Protect and serve; how was this accomplished?
I could be wrong and forgive me if I am, but I don't see how sitting outside was the right thing to do.
R/
Steve