)
Over on page 108 there were posted images of GENOFF data which is I suppose an aggregate for designator information - take a peek and it should make more sense. I definitely can't explain the columns with any conviction so just guessing.
That's a good catch I hadn't gone back to look at the dashboard info. That's probably precisely why some were moved to the next board automatically.
If you apply for SNA, SNFO, and SWO in that order, you (the board) can only have so many of those kits seated at the board before they cap it for unknown reasons. You can see that the kits waiting at board and the max number allowed was off so not everyone was going to be seen this cycle.
Just to keep using SNA as the example (since NFO isn't saturated). 160 are awaiting board according to that list - that can't be the case that those 7 remainders that got pushed over to the next board are all on this forum unless there were packets waiting prior? Clutching at straws now I suppose
I heard something like 80 applicants got pushed to the next board.... just a idea not a fact
Would explain it certainly then. Where'd you get that info from out of curiosity? Also next board is in 3 months time but they won't accept new packets until Oct this this year is maxed out already?
Not sure where those numbers are coming from. From what I see on the 22 Jan Dashboard:
@KaleDaSquid calculations that he gave me.. that man is a wizard.
Same!
Funny thing my recruiter was adamant that how I listed my designators didn’t matter ?
