What’re you pointing at me for ? I ain’t got no access!
What’re you pointing at me for ? I ain’t got no access!
Omg I remember you. You are the negative Nancy that needs to congratulate me. Remember, I told you there would be a boards. Btw why are you so argumentative? It’s my job to annoy everyone.not yours lmao.To be clear my point is to show you the exact contradictions you’re mentioning? I have called 14 NRDs and received many different responses.
To settle ALL confusion I called the man who has the answers cut and dry. Navy Community Manager of Aviation. I suggest ANYONE who has ANY doubt in what I’ve said to call for yourself. This number is from Navy.mil detailing Navy personnel command....
Head, Aviation OCM
BUPERS-313
DSN 882-3353, (901) 874-3353
He said no openings in SNA until summer of next year, BUT the presidential election and the Covid issues play a major part in this so things can change.
I’m implore you to call him yourself rather than trying to kill the messenger. I’m only trying to help each of you guys be prepared with level expectations.
Good luck to all.
Im not trying to argue, but what do you mean no further applicants getting selected, when it is showing that indeed some applicants have been selected for SNA/NFO(based off the dashboard, and GENOFF). Im just trying to understand what youre sayingYou think I’m bothered by anyone on this thread ?
the semantics of cancelled vs NO further applicants getting selected have y’all feeling better about it..? ?
This guy is relentless.You think I’m bothered by anyone on this thread ?
the semantics of cancelled vs NO further applicants getting selected have y’all feeling better about it..? ?
But im generally curious though. i mean im asking where hes getting his information that NO applicants were selected but Kale, Goldy, and Heart are providing information saying that there were people selected??.This guy is relentless.
Look @dvella12, we accept you, but you‘re missing the whole conversation. Yes we’re being realistic, but it’s also an open conversation. If you’re just going to be pessimistic and snarky, then we really just don’t care. I wouldn’t recommend going to OCS with that mindframe ?
Applicants rolled from October.... this board was for “JAN 25”Im not trying to argue, but what do you mean no further applicants getting selected, when it is showing that indeed some applicants have been selected for SNA/NFO(based off the dashboard, and GENOFF). Im just trying to understand what youre saying
But what about the 101 applicants needed to be selected to hit their recruiting "goal?Applicants rolled from October.... this board was for “JAN 25”
Sounds right.My understanding from my limited knowledge and from what other people have posted elsewhere is that the board doesnt have a "quota" they look at whatever is sent to them. It's the individual NRDs that are deciding to hold back applicants to build up FY22 or FY23 numbers
Applicants rolled from October.... this board was for “JAN 25”
exactly why his claim doesn’t make sense or match the last 20 or so pages that we have been previously discussing.But what about the 101 applicants needed to be selected to hit their recruiting "goal".
Why would they roll only some applicants to the next board but allow others to stay and be present on the AT-Board list? why not just push everyone to the next board.
Behold. You are witnessing greatnessWe have to be breaking some kind of AW record.
That stash of his is breaking records ?Behold. You are witnessing greatness