Don't have much time, so I'll keep this one brief.
They did just have a new board for selecting would-be V-22 pilots. They even offered it up to F/W guys, including letting them keep their F/W bonus. I don't think it was as well received in terms of applcations received as the last V-22 board. A lot of pilots saw the last bunch get jerked around for 2 years and didn't want the same thing to happen to them. Plus, there's a lot of skepticism about the aircraft itself.
As far as how the program is progressing, look in the MC Times, or throw chicken bones on the ground, or get some tea leaves... Your guess is as good as mine. I just think it's odd that the Osprey has been in development for 20 years to get to the form is was in...but now in one year they've made 300-some improvements, and now the thing works like a champ.
If they've solved the problems this time, I'd love to fly it. Among other things, there were concerns about its ability to hover at high altitudes. I also worry about its ability to handle brown-out, as it reputedly has huge rotorwash. It can't do a main-mount landing on a mountain like a -46 can, either. So , as much as people say it would have helped in Afghanistan, it wouldn't have been a cure-all as some suggest.
The range and speed is awesome, but what can escort it now? A jet is not a good helo escort, but the AH/UHs can't keep up. So it goes it by itself...wait, we haven't put a gun on it yet. We don't try to go into hot LZs like 'Nam anymore, but if we have to, or it happens by mistake, a weapon better than a Baretta out the window would be great.
Ideally, we could get the 22 AND another helo. Normal helo for most missions, and a V-22 for special long-range stuff. That's kind of what the USAF will do. It will still have PaveHawks and MH-53Js for most stuff, but use their CV-22 for long-range inserts. Unfortunately, Michael Jackson will be President before the Marine Corps could ever afford to do that.
Phrogs phorever