A4sForever said:but when does accountability responsibility for things like this come into play ... ???[/b]
I'm going to go with .... never ... but I'm a cynic.
A4sForever said:but when does accountability responsibility for things like this come into play ... ???[/b]
Haha. Well, it's really not funny, just ironic I guess...KBayDog said:And the plot thickens...but wait - I thought they were already in a "holy war" against us?
Here's the Newsweek semi-retraction:A4sForever said:And now Newsweek Magazine is reporting that it "may have gotten the deatils of the original story wrong". Their "source " may not have seen the Qur'an flushed down" ..... anything.
A4sForever said:And now Newsweek Magazine is reporting that it "may have gotten the deatils of the original story wrong". Their "source " may not have seen the Qur'an flushed down" ..... anything.
If so, who will be held responsible for the many lives lost as a direct result of this piece of "responsible journalism"??? I think the answer is no one ....... I'm all for the First Amendment, no question there, but when does accountability responsibility for things like this come into play ... ???
bigmouth said:I don't have a hard time believing the story. Never underestimate people's ability to make stupid decisions. But to make such a fuss about it?? Holy war???
Punish the idiots and punish the whole chain of command, and be done with it!
Brett327 said:Jihad? Bring it on, motherfvckers. Last time I checked, the last group of jihadists in Afghanistan got their asses kicked in about 5 minutes.
TurnandBurn55 said:Well, that's certainly a case of 'won the battle, but the outcome of the war remains to be seen...'
Now THAT is a great idea.KBayDog said:Since it's been 3 1/2 years since those five minutes, I'd ask Afghanistan's new government if they feel that we just "won the battle."
This isn't a matter of "winning the battle." This is a matter of some douchebag reporters making up a story. They want the culprits? Let's turn these "neutral journalists" over to them.
Newsweek Washington Bureau Chief Daniel Klaidman said the magazine believes it erred in reporting the allegation and that military investigators had confirmed the accusation.
"The issue here is to get the truth out, to acknowledge as quickly as possible what happened, and that's what we're trying to do," Klaidman told the "CBS Evening News" on Sunday.
Whitaker wrote that the magazine's information came from "a knowledgeable U.S. government source," and before publishing the item, writers Michael Isikoff and John Barry sought comment from two Defense Department officials. One declined to respond, and the other challenged another part of the story but did not dispute the Quran charge, Whitaker said.