I’ve been thinking about orgy and...
Isn't it a bit early to be hitting the sauce and think about what you and the local knitting club are going to do this weekend?
I’ve been thinking about orgy and...
I've only ridden into that RWY once in a jet, and it was after we held for a good bit due to X-winds out of limits for the main. It felt sporty with the low approach turn and jumping on the binders for the short Runway.While it is routinely used it isn’t usually the runway that gets used a lot. I have flown as a passenger into DCA well over 100 times and can only remember a handful of landings on 33. Guys from the SHOW would know much better.
I can’t even imagine what key fumbles took place there. Freudian?Isn't it a bit early to be hitting the sauce and think about what you and the local knitting club are going to do this weekend?
Still doesn’t make sense…why did the -60 turn toward DCA as indicated in the track log?
There is no doubt. I am totally speculating and will shut up, but I agree that Heli Route 4 will probably move east a bit (following I-295) to avoid DCA. But that means the flag o’s won’t get their pretty view down the river.@Griz882 I suspect this will all come out in the NTSB work.
Personal opinion and without speculation - the DC helo route system remains mostly unchanged since the 80's - as JO, I flew from KNGU to the Pentagon helipad and JB Andrews all the time day and night via these routes. Common milk run. The volume of the traffic and types of traffic today are drastically different however. I foresee changes to the structure in terms of routes and operations and ATC procedures.
Would it not be easier to just restrict runway 33 to daytime operation only to avoid visual issues. My understanding is the other runways do not conflict with helo routes?
Good video here on what may have happened to cause this:. I can't imagine the helo crews coming out of Bolling will be allowed to cross over that approach corridor any more (at least, at that point along the Potomac).
That Juan dude can't even read a chart of where JBAB is. I watched his first video and came away pissed that (1) he can't read maps, and (2) he laid blame within 24 hours of a tragic mishap.
Nope, it’s 2025. Respect and accuracy don’t get clicks. Just dEEp iNTeL.That Juan dude can't even read a chart of where JBAB is. I watched his first video and came away pissed that (1) he can't read maps, and (2) he laid blame within 24 hours of a tragic mishap.
Does the show not instill the same respect for the dead and the scientific process of accident investigation before going off half-cocked to be the first to "bring the truth the people on the Tubes of You" ?
In the vacuum there are a lot of worse takes filling the narrative. Waiting a year for the full report will only entrench the dumb takes.That Juan dude can't even read a chart of where JBAB is. I watched his first video and came away pissed that (1) he can't read maps, and (2) he laid blame within 24 hours of a tragic mishap.
Does the show not instill the same respect for the dead and the scientific process of accident investigation before going off half-cocked to be the first to "bring the truth the people on the Tubes of You" ?
Please identify the actual value brought to the public or aviation by Juan's video.In the vacuum there are a lot of worse takes filling the narrative. Waiting a year for the full report will only entrench the dumb takes.
Juan Browne seems to bring at least credible experience to bear and is more measured than some other ahem, veteran commentators we can name.
The AOPA air safety institute also used to put out really informative and measured early analysis with the late Richard McSpadden. Seems like they have spun that back up.
It’s a spectrum of professionalism and silence isn’t a useful position in this information environment.