I can think of many common household items that can be used for a "gruesome murder"
And if you're low on creativity, the movie industry is full of ideas of how to massacre freinds, family and strangers.....
I can think of many common household items that can be used for a "gruesome murder"
And if you're low on creativity, the movie industry is full of ideas of how to massacre freinds, family and strangers.....
I was speaking more toward the gun laws. Either way, I see this as an extension of the same BS.
If there are "gruesome murders" being committed with samurai swords, I STILL think that these criminals can get their hands on a sword if this law is passed while innocent citizens who collect them or have them for martial arts practice can't now (The non-collector ones).
It's just a different mindset. The Brits just aren't as concerned about such things as Americans are. Why would they? They haven't been invaded/had to fight for their independence and if a war does come along, they have had their great fleet and armies to defend them. It's just a different perspective over there.
... but there was a time when Romans and Vikings and a few other folks roamed at will.
I figured someone would bring that up, but I suppose that those Britains are not the same people as the ones from the Elizabethan era on.
But if they had banned swords THEN, the Romans and Vikings wouldn't have been able to HURT anybody, see??Well, not lately. The Spanish Armada was a worry until it fell prey to the sea and Hitler only got to saber rattling stage, but there was a time when Romans and Vikings and a few other folks roamed at will.
But if they had banned swords THEN, the Romans and Vikings wouldn't have been able to HURT anybody, see??
Oh, wait, would've had to ban battleaxes and longships, too . . . oh well.
England is a pathetic shell of its former self.
You really think that?
You don't? They needed our help during the Falklands to keep the Argentines from taking what probably should be theirs. That was when......when Reagan was boinking Thatcher?
You don't? They needed our help during the Falklands to keep the Argentines from taking what probably should be theirs. That was when......when Reagan was boinking Thatcher?
Fast forward 30 years, they don't have strategic bomber capability anymore which makes them even more hollow.