Yeah I got "dumbed" in another thread over a benign post. I assume it was the same reason.
Same here.
Yeah I got "dumbed" in another thread over a benign post. I assume it was the same reason.
Plexiglass and grease pencils? I dunno…never heard or felt there was a particular methodology to it. There probably was…but it was well above my pay grade and not the sort of thing I cared about. Certainly not "6 out" and "18 home". Cruises were about 6-8 months, and about 10-12 months turnaround. It was never the same for me twice, that's all the fidelity I can put to it.
Yeah I got "dumbed" in another thread over a benign post. I assume it was the same reason.
Okay…fair enough. I guess I'm the only one who actually believes your leadership has said what you wanted to hear, time and again.You want to talk about people skills? Your unsolicited concern for my language is not desired nor appreciated.
And how exactly do my parents interest you R1?
Here is EXACTLY what I want leadership to say: "Times are tough and money is tight. In order to meet these fiscal restraints we are going to need to squeeze everything we can out of our training and deploy more regularly for a longer period of time. I know our people are strong and can support these further burdens on our equipment and most importantly themselves and their families."
Something like that would have worked. Not "this is going to be better for you because it will be more predictable." We have a current plan for deployments and we all see how predictable that is.
The first part sounds like you've done your homework…so I can't push back. I'm sure it's true.The standard IDTC in the 90's through September 11th 9-11 was a 6 month deployment, followed by a surge period for 3 months, then stand down of about 6 months, Work ups would last approximately 9 months (TSTA I &II, TSTA III/C2X, Airwing Fallon, JTFEX, then deploy again for 6 months.
Pre-9/11 a cruise going longer than 6 months was an abbiration.
I can't speak to how it was done in the 70's and 80's.
I think I'd be willing to accept the shitty OPTEMPO, if it was hitting 17 port calls in one 6 month deployment, like in the early 90's...My only defense is that I gave up squadron command in December of 1990, so didn't experience enough of it for me to retain it, I guess.
I think I'd be willing to accept the shitty OPTEMPO, if it was hitting 17 port calls in one 6 month deployment, like in the early 90's...
Yup, that was my brother-in-law's cruise in '94-ish timeframe. They basically got underway long enough to get to the next port. He came back broke, but with a lot of cool shit.That tops my 10 port call summer Med cruise on the JFK IN 97!
I think I'd be willing to accept the shitty OPTEMPO, if it was hitting 17 port calls in one 6 month deployment, like in the early 90's...
That's just wrongAnd if every freaking port's liberty policy wasn't Cinderella liberty. Esp. in fucking Scotland.
What can I say? OUR leadership rocked!I think I'd be willing to accept the shitty OPTEMPO, if it was hitting 17 port calls in one 6 month deployment, like in the early 90's...
What can I say? OUR leadership rocked!
Yeah, I never really liked you guys…but I'm working on it to this very day…But R1, you were our leadership...
... Palma de Majorca...
Never got to go to Palma.Palma in the summer.... I don't know if it can get better than that!!