But where's the fun in that? The log hit is a better photo opOr a pier side crane. Which is how the LHD gets harrier motors now.
Meh, I don't recall ever having FOD issues due to non-skid ingestion, if that's what you're implying. It's pretty brittle.How many motors get changed during deployment depends strongly on how much ill-executed work gets done on the flight deck nonskid during that deployment.
Is the deck spot much larger for the CH-53K than the V-22?
(hey, I was Maritime, so I'm not quite sure about this boat thing ...)
Nope, something else. A bunch of Harriers needed engine changes on a gator a few years ago. It wasn't nonskid ingestion so much as FOD the mess left behind from some work that got done on the flight deck surface.Meh, I don't recall ever having FOD issues due to non-skid ingestion, if that's what you're implying. It's pretty brittle.
You mean it isn’t a good idea to use tiny bb’s to blast off nonskid?Nope, something else. A bunch of Harriers needed engine changes on a gator a few years ago. It wasn't nonskid ingestion so much as FOD the mess left behind from some work that got done on the flight deck surface.
Thanks- I thought there were little ball bearings involved but my memory was foggy (I wasn't there, just heard about it). I was thinking to myself, 'that's such a terrible idea it's impossible, nobody would be dumb enough to try that' and I figured I must have mixed up the details.You mean it isn’t a good idea to use tiny bb’s to blast off nonskid?
If loose non-skid could FOD a motor, the entire air wing would be a flaming wreck by the end of fly-on and CQ . . .Meh, I don't recall ever having FOD issues due to non-skid ingestion, if that's what you're implying. It's pretty brittle.
Nope, something else. A bunch of Harriers needed engine changes on a gator a few years ago. It wasn't nonskid ingestion so much as FOD the mess left behind from some work that got done on the flight deck surface.
Nope, something else. A bunch of Harriers needed engine changes on a gator a few years ago. It wasn't nonskid ingestion so much as FOD the mess left behind from some work that got done on the flight deck surface.
I see some of you are blissfully ignorant of the procedures that govern how non-skid is removed, repaired, and applied. Bottom line is that the accepted method to remove old non-skid and to prepare the surface for a new application requires the use of an ablative material. The ablative material that is commmonly used is small metal shot. Although people will call them “bbs” they’re much smaller, probably the size of a ball point pen ball. Because of the know FOD hazard of these “BBs” the removal process is done within double walled vinyl tents to keep the BBs enclosed. Once the removal is complete the contractor is supposed to clean up the remaining BBs, QA the process, apply new non skid (process that requires specific environmental conditions), wait for new non skid to cure, and then take down the tents. However, if the QA process isn’t good or the tents are taken down early due to schedule pressures then it’s possible for the BBs to get out into the wild where they will likely be ingested down the intake of the nearest jet motor.You mean it isn’t a good idea to use tiny bb’s to blast off nonskid?
We did have a helo Pilot accidentally punch flares as he landed in spot 9. Found little angry burnt discs all over the place, to include the intakes of one of the F’s...
I know...never say never, but any idea how this happened? While my thumb might be near the guard, I don't think I've ever accidentally hit the button, and it requires a bit of "thumb wrestling" to get my thumb back that 1/4" to start pressing in past the guard. And I've got pretty big hands.