Never heard of the guyHunter Biden
Never heard of the guyHunter Biden
So in my quick searching of this, it looks like they banned the story based on the fact that it contained personal information obtained by hacking into someone's computer.Now that the election is over. Before, Twitter suspended the NYP account for tweeting their story. Facebook did its part as well. It’s fairly well documented
No hacking.So in my quick searching of this, it looks like they banned the story based on the fact that it contained personal information obtained by hacking into someone's computer.
Would you want Twitter / Facebook / whoever to suppress your PII and bank account information if it was stolen? That was the principle that they applied.
Am I missing something?
This was worse, because of what was going on in the building and what they were trying to do.Exactly. Just another indication of the hypocrisy.
There are many things in the world that happen without precedent. Last year, this election, etc. I think what you are really asking is whether there are legal grounds for that to happen, or if there is a legal precedent to support that interpretation of existing law? I will leave that to the courts to decide. I get that you don't feel this was an attack on the federal government.....which is another thing that ultimately the courts and evidence will hopefully clarify. But this:
View attachment 28873
......is an awfully bad look for someone collecting a federally funded pension.
Wait, what ????These folks straight up stormed stormed the very building that actually houses the constitution in an attempt to prevent elected officials from conducting their constitutional duties. There are some actions that just cannot be tolerated.
Why else would they break in? Disrupting the certification process is probably the most benign offense these people could be accused of.Wait, what ????
YHGTBFSM . . .
Opportunity, compounded by a twisted mob mentality.Why else would they break in?
Could you describe the ruckus?Wait, what ????
YHGTBFSM . . .
Right?! I mean, if you're going to conduct an armed insurrection, have clear goal for Christ's sake. If you're going to permanently f@#K your life up by invading the Capitol at the literal pinnacle of Democracy (declaring the next President) at least get something accomplished other than permanently f@#king your life up. Too funny...not really.I would argue the second biggest failure that day, next to Capitol security, was the lack of an actual message once inside. All of this time and energy, penetrating security, risking injury/arrest/death, and all that really came out of it was people making Tik-Tok selfies wearing a buffalo head. Kind of seems like it's the right's equivalent to stealing a new iMac from a retailer's storefront.
While the George Floyd riots were alarming, destructive, and violent they aren't even remotely in the same ballpark as what took place at the Capitol. I'll compare most (excluding the pacific NW which I agree are in the same ballpark) riots to the Rodney King riots in LA. Defunding the police, while a terrible idea, does not possess the same gravity as invading the Capitol to subvert the outcome of an election and change the outcome of the electoral vote.I wonder if the same was done to violent protesters who were burning down businesses and police stations during the BLM nonsense.
Exactly?! HAL, they're all out to get you man. Head for the hills, only the strong will survive. [/QUOTE]Exactly. Just another indication of the hypocrisy.
Dude. That’s a policeman getting beat in the middle. That’s the Capitol he was defending in the background. Defined ‘armed’ and ‘insurrection’ whatever way you like. That won’t change what actually occurred.You keep saying “armed insurrection” yet only one person was shot, and it was police/secret service that did the shooting. Stop being ridiculous.
Armed and insurrection have definitions. That’s not what happened. No one here is trying to “change what actually occurred”Dude. That’s a policeman getting beat in the middle. That’s the Capitol he was defending in the background. Defined ‘armed’ and ‘insurrection’ whatever way you like. That won’t change what actually occurred.