There are a group of countries opening up. Called the first movers group. Among the members are Austria, Denmark, Norway, Greece, the Czech Republic, Israel, Singapore, New Zealand and Australia.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/st...discussed-by-the-first-movers-covid-19-group/
It's a good idea to do enough testing, to make sure you are getting the people who are infected. With a tracing program and random testing. You do use more tests, but you find the infections.
View attachment 25738
Australia and New Zealand are not good comparisons for us...they didn't flatten the curve, they smashed it.
They caught it early enough that their community transmission rate is near zero...entire states are going days without any reports of new COVID infections, while NZ may become entirely COVID free. Their re-opening was also contingent on the population downloading tracing software (not mandatory, but it was a metric tracked as part of their decision to re-open to ensure a contact tracing method was in place)
Oz also has a very different governing federal-state relationships. They have a National Cabinet, where the governors make decisions in coordination with all the other states and federal government. Interstate borders are also very easy to enforce (inland from the coasts is basically unpopulated). They also only have several states...we have 50. They're also keeping international borders effectively closed. Reopening is within domestic borders only.
Long story short: Re-opening should be a completely uncontroversial decision if you have extremely low case load, which lets you test frequently to manage outbreaks, and you have an effective contact tracing system.
We aren't there yet, and we likely won't any time soon.
Bigger issue with us seems to be that we're half assing it. If you effectively shut the entire damn country down for X weeks, at the same time, of course your case load will plummet, spread throughout the country stops, and you then just have to manage small outbreaks from getting out of control as you reopen.
I don't know that we can do that...it's going to be hard to get everybody to agree to that. Because if you can't control it, a half assed lockdown where we can't drive the infection case load down to zero basically just increases the odds the inevitable flare up after reopening will get out of control.
The middle ground alternative, then, is a slow burn.
Fully reopening likely won't get us the full economic benefit either, as the % of our GDP from international trade won't fully recover either. Travel to/from the US and "clean" nations will likely be problematic until we get our case load under control.