• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

COVID-19

Hair Warrior

Well-Known Member
Contributor
giphy.gif
I want a gif like this, except with a NAM ?
 

Jim123

DD-214 in hand and I'm gonna party like it's 1998
pilot
The 5G is what’s behind this
Hehehe, I was hoping for that :D

But aside from having a bit of fun with this, while @Maxillarious might've shot past the target a bit on his post (and ruffled a lot of feathers on here), I think the jury is still out on this part:
this is a 100 year opportunity that will undoubtedly be taken advantage of by adversaries to further their own policies and agendas and upset the apple cart of the global balance of power.
 

Hair Warrior

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Hospital ships, didn’t do much now they’re gone. Field hospitals, did they even see a single patient? They’re gone. Etc etc
Totally agree. And also, in the strictest definition, to corroborate your earlier question, a plan can be a level 3 or 3T plan instead of a level 4 plan but we won’t speculate on those specifics here.
 

Treetop Flyer

Well-Known Member
pilot

Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 can induce virus-specific T cell responses without seroconversion. T cell responses may be more sensitive indicators of SARS-Co-V-2 exposure than antibodies. Our results indicate that epidemiological data relying only on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may lead to a substantial underestimation of prior exposure to the virus”
 

Hair Warrior

Well-Known Member
Contributor
I wonder what people think of this travel ban in NY, NJ, and CT on travelers from other US states. Looks to be targeted only at “Republican” states (AL, AR, AZ, FL, NC, SC, TX, WA), which as we know there is no such thing, but it’s telling that CA was omitted despite a surge in new cases. To me it would not appear Constitutional to restrict interstate travel and impose unequal fines. I also wonder if the people who support the NY-NJ-CT travel decision did or did not support PTOUS for the international travel bans in previous years.
 

Spekkio

He bowls overhand.

Put the tinfoil hat away. I'm on the side of COVID restrictions being stupid, but these governors didn't make their decisions just to stick it to the GOP.
 
Last edited:

Hair Warrior

Well-Known Member
Contributor

Put the tinfoil hat away. I'm on the side of COVID restrictions being stupid, but these governors didn't make their decisions just to stick it to the GOP.
Is there a rational explanation why MA, VA, MD, CA, IL, MI, etc were left off the list? They all have high virus populations as well. Not to mention, why are they not preventing people from going from CT to NJ and vice versa? Both states have high rates. Really dumb all around. If someone has a valid reason to travel from CT to NJ, who is to say they don’t have the same valid reason if coming from FL?
 
Last edited:

Treetop Flyer

Well-Known Member
pilot
I wonder what people think of this travel ban in NY, NJ, and CT on travelers from other US states. Looks to be targeted only at “Republican” states (AL, AR, AZ, FL, NC, SC, TX, WA), which as we know there is no such thing, but it’s telling that CA was omitted despite a surge in new cases. To me it would not appear Constitutional to restrict interstate travel and impose unequal fines. I also wonder if the people who support the NY-NJ-CT travel decision did or did not support PTOUS for the international travel bans in previous years.
It’s not actually a travel ban, it’s a 14 day quarantine for people arriving from those states. Texas and Florida both had something similar but it is strange that California didn’t make the list.

The part about “we worked hard to get our transmission rate down and don’t want to see it go up” is rich. Cuomo bragging about reducing transmission rate is like a firefighter arriving late to a burnt down house and bragging that the fire’s out.
 
Top