"In light of the coronavirus pandemic, much of the SERE instruction was already being conducted online"
I can think of a few parts of SERE that would have sucked less if it were online...
Yes, the RTL would have been MUCH easier through online teaching. How would that work? Would you have to punch yourself while hanging out in smallest kitchen cabinet while playing "Boots" over your Hi-Fi system?"In light of the coronavirus pandemic, much of the SERE instruction was already being conducted online"
I can think of a few parts of SERE that would have sucked less if it were online...
The online SERE 100 training is a good start. Slow...painful...barely relevant...software sucks (like a bad version of Minecraft)... It should almost qualify as a substitute for some of the less agreeable parts of SERE.Yes, the RTL would have been MUCH easier through online teaching. How would that work? Would you have to punch yourself while hanging out in smallest kitchen cabinet while playing "Boots" over your Hi-Fi system?
I'll see your 4 year old study, and raise you a 2020 study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology specifically concerning the ability of cloth/cotton masks to block Covid-19(like) particles:This excerpt is from a 2016 study done by a Fellow of the Royal College of Dentists of Canada to determine the effectiveness of face masks in a dental environment. If this clinical-based, scientific study determined that they’re not effective in that setting, what exactly has changed in the past four years that makes them necessary for everyday wear.
“The primary reason for mandating the wearing of face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are incapable of providing such a level of protection. Unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, national and provincial dental associations and regulatory agencies publically admit this fact, they will be guilty of perpetuating a myth which will be a disservice to the dental profession and its patients.“
Update: Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review - Oral Health Group
For at least three decades face masks has been deemed an essential component of the personal protective equipment worn by dental personnel.www.oralhealthgroup.com
“The bottom line is that none of these fabrics are as good as an N95 mask. Still, cloth face coverings can help slow the spread of coronavirus,” said study author and fellow NIST researcher Christopher Zangmeister. “We hope this research will help manufacturers and DIYers determine the best fabrics for the job and serve as a basis for additional research.”
In this case, it is to protect us from your pathogens, not you from ours. If we all wear them, we are all protected.“The primary reason for mandating the wearing of face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens."
Our analysis reveals that the difference with and without mandated face covering represents the determinant in shaping the pandemic trends in the three epicenters. This protective measure alone significantly reduced the number of infections, that is, by over 78,000 in Italy from April 6 to May 9 and over 66,000 in New York City from April 17 to May 9. Other mitigation measures, such as social distancing implemented in the United States, are insufficient by themselves in protecting the public. We conclude that wearing of face masks in public corresponds to the most effective means to prevent interhuman transmission, and this inexpensive practice, in conjunction with simultaneous social distancing, quarantine, and contact tracing, represents the most likely fighting opportunity to stop the COVID-19 pandemic. Our work also highlights the fact that sound science is essential in decision-making for the current and future public health pandemics.
You’d think something so groundbreaking and conclusive would be in the public domain.I'll see your 4 year old study, and raise you a 2020 study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology specifically concerning the ability of cloth/cotton masks to block Covid-19(like) particles:
https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2020/07/cotton-is-best-for-homemade-masks-study-suggests/
BLUF (Emphasis by me):
Link to the study if you care to spend the cash.
Why didn't you google on "face mask efficacy"? You'd have gotten tons of hits answering your question, and no links to an obscure oral health magazine article that doesn't even directly address the issue at hand.You’d think something so groundbreaking and conclusive would be in the public domain.
Perfect.In this case, it is to protect us from your pathogens, not you from ours. If we all wear them, we are all protected.
Here's a recent (within the last week or so) peer-reviewed article.
Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19
We have elucidated the transmission pathways of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by analyzing the trend and mitigation measures in the three epicenters. Our results show that the airborne transmission route is highly virulent and dominant for the spread of COVID-19. The mitigation measures...www.pnas.org
My god the hypocrisy: so unless the "mainstream media" is covering this study then this study has no merit?? The media is either a reliable source or it isn't, pick one.You’d think something so groundbreaking and conclusive would be in the public domain.
Any major non-Australian networks covering this groundbreaking study yet?
Hey dude, I have a finite amount of google searches to dispense, frankly, and generally don't waste it on things that I don’t care about like face mask efficacy. I'm also aware that a lot of what happens on Internet forums is an outrage generating machine. I try not to get sucked into it.Why didn't you google on "face mask efficacy"? You'd have gotten tons of hits answering your question, and no links to an obscure oral health magazine article that doesn't even directly address the issue at hand.
Only in theory.The argument is that school should be conducted virtually vice in person. So they'd still be working.
What’s hypocritical? If this is such a definitive answer I’m surprised that the major outlets haven’t picked up on it yet. I posted a link to major study that should be out soon regarding the efficacy of masks specifically guarding against SARS-covid-2. Doubt it will get much coverage.My god the hypocrisy: so unless the "mainstream media" is covering this study then this study has no merit?? The media is either a reliable source or it isn't, pick one.
Just wear a mask alreadyI'm also aware that a lot of what happens on Internet forums is an outrage generating machine. I try not to get sucked into it.
Clearly, you need to revisit my post history about this.Just wear a mask already