Just like the pandemic information we get from COVID briefings and the press, information on hydroxychloroquine as a treatment is often lacking in relevance and detail. The strongest resistance to the pursuit of this treatment is political. Majority of the people most against it and eager to highlight any negative experiences with it hate Trump.
None of these stories say anything about dosing, when treatment began, condition of patients when treatment began, what existing risk factors they had, or even the exact medicines and in what combination were used. So, I say fuck anyone who believes any of these news stories are the definitive last word.
The most promising treatment I have read is hydroxychloroquine, not chloroquine as some "studies" have used, azithromycin and zinc sulfate. Zinc seems to be key. None of the recent articles posted here, to include the twitter linked AP article mention any use of zinc. The dose of HCQ is similar to what Is used for patients who take it for on label approved illness, like lupas. The azithromycin dose is normal as it is used to simply treat lung infection from damage done by the virus. Most of the success come from cases where treatment is started very early. Clearly that makes it a bit difficult to determine who gets well because of the treatment, or simply recovers as they would have without treatment. But you would get a good picture with a large enough sample. We now know pretty well what percent recover without hospitalization, go to hospital recover, or die.
If administered in dosages similar to on label use, no one should die from the drugs. You find very few serious docs currently treating COVID patients that think it is actually harmful when administered in proper doses. It is very inexpensive and readily available so early treatment with a HCQ treatment in acceptable doses is highly unlikely to do harm and can be sustained for days without breaking the bank. If it helps, great. If it doesn't, no worse off.