So what youre saying is we should be happy that the Republicans are thoughtfully giving us the reach around while sticking it to us
Exactly, no reacharound from the Dems. Hey, if you're gonna take it, it might as well be pleasant....
So what youre saying is we should be happy that the Republicans are thoughtfully giving us the reach around while sticking it to us
I agree.Like everything else the extremes of both parties have taken over and it is AFU.
Not familiar. What does that mean?(libertarian with a lower case "l")
Not familiar. What does that mean?
Good deal. I thought it would be something along those lines.A libertarian is a classical liberal. Yes, liberal was NOT leftist years ago. Jefferson would be called a liberal. Libertarians are what Republicans should be, but have moved away from. Small government, personal freedom, etc etc etc.
I'm libertarian at heart, but, well, they have no hope of even getting a piece of an election.
Not familiar. What does that mean?
get rid of welfare
hmm, let me see if i can explain this with reasonable brevity (and i'm a mech engineer, not a poli sci guy. anyone with a background in this stuff, feel free to chime in and help.)
first of all, there is some confusion inherent in using the terms "conservative", "liberal", "right", and "left"--particularly the former two. there is a difference between what they literally mean and how they're often used (misused?). but we'll save that topic for later...
instead of political issues being split between the "right" and the "left", what you really have, at the most basic level, are fiscal and social issues. tax code reforms, trade restrictions, etc, are fiscal issues. abortion, stem cell research, pot legalization, and the death penalty are social issues. (realistically, most issues are somewhere in the middle...welfare and medicare, for example. they kinda fall under both categories).
anyway, you can then lean either to the left or the right on both fiscal and social issues. this gives us 4 (instead of 2) political categories of people (at the most fundamental level, at least).
Fiscal Conservative, Social Conservative: this is what the republican party preaches, but they're straying away from the fiscal part.
Fiscal Liberal, Social Liberal: the mantra of the Democratic party, basically.
Fiscal Conservative, Social Liberal: this is what a Libertarian is. They want the government out of your business except when absolutely necessary (and a card-carrying Libertarian--with the capital "L" usually takes it to an unrealistic, scary extreme).
Fiscal Liberal, Social Conservative: I would, for lack of a better term, refer to this as Authoritarianism. They'd want Uncle Sam to have an increased role and control in everything.
at any rate, I said libertarian with a lower-case "l" because I'm not a crazy ass member of the Libertarian party. I DO like the ideology, but the actual Libertarian party is WAAAAY out there on the edge (like, let's privatize the highway system, legalize heroin, get rid of welfare, etc)
for the record, i'm fairly fiscally conservative, and socially kind of a centrist.
and I plan on getting into politics one day...so vote for me.
I've got no problem with that. Welfare breeds poverty. A hard lesson many never learn.
and i don't think that there's as much money to be saved through welfare reforms as some people think, unfortunately.