It’s an effort to repeal the 2002 AUMF (Iraq war), which isn’t relevant to this discussion.The most recent NDAA repeals the GWOT AUMF with strong bipartisan support.
We'll see if it has veto override power.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s an effort to repeal the 2002 AUMF (Iraq war), which isn’t relevant to this discussion.The most recent NDAA repeals the GWOT AUMF with strong bipartisan support.
We'll see if it has veto override power.
compared to a state versus non-state actor during... AUMF, I suppose?
and whether or not heading would have mattered depending on the ROE.
Well it is called WILDerness for a reason.I bet it gets wild out by you, as you get further and further into the woods/middle of nowhere (that term being a good thing)
That was step one.…and fire the JAGs.
Couple of good articles in the NYT and The Atlantic discussing this might be reasserting the Monroe Doctrine and also Secretary of State Rubio’s involvement.Bottom line, this should have been a F3EA thing, (find, fix, finish, exploit, analyze) thing. It’s what I did for three years of my life.
To the best of my knowledge, they just did F3. The only reason I can think of to not do the exploit/analyze is to get rid of the evidence.
Sink the evidence and fire the JAGs.
As an MQ-9 guy, this sucks. It doesn't matter if it's true or not, our political leaders have put them in a position where they will second guess themselves. Did they kill people who didn't deserve it? Maybe. Maybe they're okay with it now. Maybe it will haunt their dreams and keep them from a night's sleep when they're 70.
We killed a lot of innocent people in the GWOT via hellfire from a Predator or Reaper because we didn't really understand what was going on. I want to believe we learned something from that.
I want to believe that the guys who pulled the weapons consent switch will be able to know that these people deserved to die.
I fear that our politicians won't lose sleep over this. I fear they've moved on. Meanwhile a JO and an NCO is grappling with a decision every time they log on to social media.
The thing is: for good people, empathy doesn't stop at national origin, socioeconomic status, race, gender, or political affiliation.
View attachment 43424
This has been true since the beginning of warfare.I want to believe that the guys who pulled the weapons consent switch will be able to know that these people deserved to die.
If you don't believe it the kill/attack is valid, you don't pull the trigger (switch, button, device).
Hence, the need for "the ethics of warfare" to be taught and studied throughout one's military career, no matter how short or long that may be.things in war are rarely so clean, and pressures from above only further complicate the picture.
I'm not outraged, I'm disappointed. As I was when we killed the guy who had a car full of water, that we were so sure was a bomb, during the AFG pullout. I also was during the Obama era where we'd kill anyone who was digging in a field at night (then we learned they farmed at night because it was much cooler), or walking with a rifle, etc...![]()
Afghan family decimated by US drone strike awaits justice from Washington
An Afghan family that lost 10 members, including seven children, in a mistaken U.S. drone strike on a Kabul home says it is still seeking justice and has yet to hear from the Americans more than two months after the tragedy.www.reuters.com
Hope you were just as outraged at this
This has been true since the beginning of warfare.
If you don't believe it the kill/attack is valid, you don't pull the trigger (switch, button, device).
This hold true up to and including our nuclear capability (fail safe).
I do believe that the ethics of warfare/killing should be more than just a cursory study, if it even happens at all in Officer and NCO training institutions.