OK, 172sWhy waste turboprop fuel?
OK, 172sWhy waste turboprop fuel?
…some single engine turboprops could be a solution.
OK, 172s
CAPs gotta CAP!OK, 172s
In this case, CAP’s gonna tap.CAPs gotta CAP!
@sevenhelmet I do wonder what our stocks of "old" AIM-9s are to the point we'd be willing to part with them, much like a lot of what we've given them. Just because it's not an AIM-9X to take to the merge with a Flanker doesn't mean it isn't useful to them.
For example, we worked with them to convert old Osa/Buk systems to fire AIM-9 and AIM-7. Just like I'm good using old TOW rockets to pop the tops of T-72s
Ukraine Situation Report: 'FrankenSAM' To Speed Delivery Of Air Defenses
The DoD and its allies are cobbling together parts to make new air defense systems for Ukraine, including one using the AIM-9L/M sidewinder.www.thedrive.com
An AIM-9 seems like overkill - couldn’t you just some guided version of a 2.75” rocket ?Good thing to wonder. I’m no expert by any means, but I imagine it’s a balancing act between us helping UKR and using up old ammo stocks while managing enough remaining inventory in case “oh shit” happens.
The low IR heat signature of Shitheads might limit the utility of the old AIM-9s against the drone threat. Depends on what generation the missiles are. Could maybe be better used against Russian fighter/attack aircraft- some of which they were made to bring down.
Weapon/target pairing is definitely being stretched to the limit over there.
APKWS? Just need to cue a laser onto the drone. It’s about $20-25K a pop though.An AIM-9 seems like overkill - couldn’t you just some guided version of a 2.75” rocket ?
SA-8 and SA-11 systems, for the love of God. I don't care if the Russians designated it the 42Zh69WTFBBQ, NATO's system doesn't make my brain hurt.@sevenhelmetFor example, we worked with them to convert old Osa/Buk systems to fire AIM-9 and AIM-7.[/URL]
Slight tangent, but why do modern fighter planes even have machine guns if the pilot only gets like four trigger pulls? Is that really enough to defend against an enemy plane?You're right. The problem is two-fold. How do you manage closure when you're hundreds of knots faster than the target, and if you get in close enough to hit the thing, how do you avoid the frag envelope?
That's the crux of my argument against F-16 (or MiG-29 or Su-27, or any fast jet) vs. Shaheed. A slower platform (helo, prop, etc.) with the maneuverability to turn behind the drone could make a bigger difference, especially if it doesn't need to reload every 4th time the trigger is squeezed.
These days, it’s mostly used for air shows and other public displays.Slight tangent, but why do modern fighter planes even have machine guns if the pilot only gets like four trigger pulls? Is that really enough to defend against an enemy plane?
These days, it’s mostly used for air shows and other public displays.
At the NAS Chase Field airshow in 1991 we ran the T2 gun pattern along the show line with instructors flying. They let kids pick up the spent rounds along the runway after the show.Huh? When was the last time you saw someone actually shoot a gun at an airshow?