Too bad. I think a CIWS on a trailer is a goddamned good idea for Ukraine. Beats engaging Shithead drones with Patriot missiles at ~$4M each.
C-RAM is great, but it is a point defense weapon with very short range. It is a great defense for a force in a small number of bases like we had/have in Iraq and Afghanistan but for a much larger area with many more targets that Ukraine has to defend against it is less effective. One of the advantages of the Gepard is its mobility while the C-RAM is a lot less so. The FrankenSAM thing is a much better solution given its longer reach and ready availability of missiles.
For example, we worked with them to convert old Osa/Buk systems to fire AIM-9 and AIM-7. Just like I'm good using old TOW rockets to pop the tops of T-72s
SA-8 and SA-11 systems, for the love of God. I don't care if the Russians designated it the 42Zh69WTFBBQ, NATO's system doesn't make my brain hurt.
For the Buk you mean the SA-11, SA-17, SA-27 and SA-N-12 along with the HQ-16, HHQ-16 and LY-80? The last three are Chinese designations but I can't easily find the NATO names.
Aren't missile designations fun?!