I have enjoyed the speculation and debate regarding Russia's next move and going nuclear. But I have run out of popcorn, so putting down the empty bucket, I have hands to type with.
We all know Russian is getting beat up a good bit. Seems to me that some of the timelines I read about here are too short to allow the Russians to purge the military of scapegoats, promote Putin sycophants, refit, and retrain. To then take on any NATO country would seem suicidal when there may be other less risky moves that would make for incremental advancement of a new Russian Empire. Why not Moldova? Russia does not share a direct border, though they may if Ukraine cedes some of the southeast in a peace bid. Former state of the USSR, Moldova even has their own disputed territory in Transnistria. That makes Moldova suited to the Russian playbook. Poor, small marginal military, no NATO or EU membership, a grape for the picking. Even the Russian military should be able to take it given 30 days ?. Sure, Moldova is a member of the Russian dominated Commonwealth of Independent States, but so was Ukraine and that didn't stop Russia from fomenting trouble in the east and taking Crimea. I have read a lot of compelling arguments in these pages. Learned a good bit too. But I think we are stuck on the crown jewel of Russia's possible courses of action. No matter whether it goes nuclear or not, the cost would be catastrophic because of the Article 5 trigger. They have other options to rebuild the empire and bring home a military victory for the propagandists.