Oh, definitely. They are not a fan of the Bush administration. Still, some balance is nice.wink said:I'm happy to read a critique on the Kelly piece. Keep in mind that Media Matters is a left leaning Bush bashing organization.
Oh, definitely. They are not a fan of the Bush administration. Still, some balance is nice.wink said:I'm happy to read a critique on the Kelly piece. Keep in mind that Media Matters is a left leaning Bush bashing organization.
I'd like to see some balance. All I am seeing is a see saw at high speed. If we could harness the media spin we wouldn't need gas for our cars.squorch2 said:Oh, definitely. They are not a fan of the Bush administration. Still, some balance is nice.
What does that have to do with ANYTHING?! Did anyone in this forum join the military because they wanted to support a specific president? How many of us joined in the Clinton years?BOMBSonHAWKEYES said:Nfo2b, you might want to rethink about joining the armed forces if you feel so strongly against the office of the president.
Bingo.UInavy said:Not sure he's exactly 'against the Office of the President'. I think he'd just like the President to take a stronger stand against critics with weak arguments...
Yeah, maybe you're right. Maybe I shouldn't join the Navy...BOMBSonHAWKEYES said:Nfo2b, you might want to rethink about joining the armed forces if you feel so strongly against the office of the president.
UInavy said:Not sure he's exactly 'against the Office of the President'. I think he'd just like the President to take a stronger stand against critics with weak arguments...
nfo2b said:Bingo.
DCLegal said:Agreed. I wish the President had not conceded and took responsibility, but held his ground.
squeeze said:Ya... because when you're in charge and sh-t goes wrong on your watch, you should pass the buck. It's the American way.
squeeze said:Ya... because when you're in charge and sh-t goes wrong on your watch, you should pass the buck. It's the American way.
DCLegal said:I am not saying he should pass the buck. But I think it is entirely way too soon for anyone to admit responsibility, especially the President. I think everyone really needs to fully understand the situation, what really happened, and what went wrong before we start blaming anyone or taking responsibility for screwing up. There are too many unanswered questions to start accepting or tossing blame.
Hell no! I sure wish that we had more of this in leaders of all types. Saying "hey - I was in charge when this fvckup happened, and I'll take steps to ensure it won't happen again" go a long way in instilling confidence in leaders.jamnww said:I love how people attack the President for not taking responsibility and now they are doing it because he did...sigh
This, and other posts above yours, indicate a gross misconception of what has happened. In essence, there was no f*ckup. The article that started this thread is 100% true, and if you do your homework, you'll see that there's alot of evidence that bears this out. Basically (and I'm grossly oversimplifying here, you can do your own homework on this), our Emergency Services, NG, et. al. reacted quickly, and responded appropriately about as quickly as practically possible. The only real "f*ckups" were by the Mayor (didn't provide enough material support to aide in the preemptive evacuation of NO) and the Governor, who delayed her requests for extra assistance due to confusion and lack of information.squorch2 said:Hell no! I sure wish that we had more of this in leaders of all types. Saying "hey - I was in charge when this fvckup happened, and I'll take steps to ensure it won't happen again" go a long way in instilling confidence in leaders.
("this fvckup" is a general fvckup, and doesn't refer to any specific fvckups of past or present.)