Do NFO's even have to worry about currency?Or TACRON DH. Not all OP-T billets are in the VTs.
Do NFO's even have to worry about currency?Or TACRON DH. Not all OP-T billets are in the VTs.
Do NFO's even have to worry about currency?
Ralph, No, after shore tour, you have to do a dis-associated sea tour which is normally non-flying. The timing works out that you are usually up for O-4/LCDR and are going up for Department Head.If he does a non flying shore tour not TPS does he have a chance to go back to a flying tour next?
As a more current data point a peer of mine went to become an Ohlmstead Scholar and was 2xFOS for O-4. When he called the detailer to negotiate disassociated orders he was given his choice of crap billets to include ATO on the CVN. He had a high up contact at PERS who said even if he had been the CNO's aide it wouldn't have saved him from getting FOSd.
The Navy's loss, pretty stupid to make that investment and then cut them loose. Myopic, why have someone like that when you can have nothing but former RAG instructors as your DH pool? Stavridis and McMaster would be proud. Fortunately it did not happen to the folks I know who went similar routes.
Agreed.
Ducks pick ducks.
As my O-4 board nears, and I start thinking about next year's DH board, I've realized that if I make DH, I will leave my test tour current in the 60 but utterly non-proficient in fleet-flying and tactics. I would argue that my in-residence master's and test experience will contribute to my performance as a DH/O-4/leader on the ground. But as you say, I'll be expected to train NRFs in tactics - which I won't have performed in over 5 years by the time I reach my DH tour. I can cram a ton of NSAWC reading material into my head before reporting, but that's a poor replacement for recent flight experience.You both make valid points; however, it's also worth remembering that a DH pilot is supposed to be one of the senior, most experienced aviators in the ready room - in addition to other responsibilities. A guy might have done a JO tour, a non-production (i.e., non-flying, non-developing, non-experience building) shore tour, then onto another non-flying disassociated (or whatever you want to call it tour) - then he shows up as a DH with nothing more in his logbook than he had when he left five or six years prior. You can't ignore the impact that has, especially in a small ready room where you can't "hide" someone.
As my O-4 board nears, and I start thinking about next year's DH board, I've realized that if I make DH, I will leave my test tour current in the 60 but utterly non-proficient in fleet-flying and tactics. I would argue that my in-residence master's and test experience will contribute to my performance as a DH/O-4/leader on the ground. But as you say, I'll be expected to train NRFs in tactics - which I won't have performed in over 5 years by the time I reach my DH tour. I can cram a ton of NSAWC reading material into my head before reporting, but that's a poor replacement for recent flight experience.
I guess what I'm saying is that I'm reluctantly realizing why production tours, especially those in fleet models (FRS/WWS) are valued so highly.
But for a hinge to have credibility in the ready room, they should have more aviation experience - preferably in gray aircraft - than the JO's.
You both make valid points; however, it's also worth remembering that a DH pilot is supposed to be one of the senior, most experienced aviators in the ready room - in addition to other responsibilities. A guy might have done a JO tour, a non-production (i.e., non-flying, non-developing, non-experience building) shore tour, then onto another non-flying disassociated (or whatever you want to call it tour) - then he shows up as a DH with nothing more in his logbook than he had when he left five or six years prior. You can't ignore the impact that has, especially in a small ready room where you can't "hide" someone.
I can cram a ton of NSAWC reading material into my head before reporting, but that's a poor replacement for recent flight experience.
That said, I don't think we typically look to DH's for tactical instruction - that's what training officers are for.